ArticleFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology2025
Development and validation of a clinical prediction model for pneumonia - associated bloodstream infections.
Article in Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- [Advances in the Application of Artificial Intelligence in Clinical Microbiological Testing].Sichuan da xue xue bao. Yi xue ban = Journal of Sichuan University. Medical science edition · 2026Review
- Risk Factors and Medical Burden of Multidrug-Resistant Organism Infection in Hospitalized Patients with Pneumonia.Infection and drug resistance · 2026Article
- Early diagnosis and prognostic prediction of secondary bloodstream infections caused byFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: The aim of this study was to develop a valuable clinical prediction model for pneumonia-associated bloodstream infections (PABSIs). Patients and methods: The study retrospectively collected clinical data of pneumonia patients at the First Medical Centre of the Chinese People's Liberation Army General Hospital from 2019 to 2024. Patients who met the definition of pneumonia-associated bloodstream infections (PABSIs) were selected as the main research subjects. A prediction model for the probability of bloodstream infections (BSIs) in pneumonia patients was constructed using a combination of LASSO regression and logistic regression. The performance of the model was verified using several indicators, including receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve, calibration curve, decision curve analysis (DCA) and cross validation. Results: A total of 423 patients with confirmed pneumonia were included in the study, in accordance with the Inclusion Criteria and Exclusion Criteria. Of the patients included in the study, 73 developed a related bloodstream infection (BSI). A prediction model was constructed based on six predictors: long-term antibiotic use, invasive mechanical ventilation, glucocorticoids, urinary catheterization, vasoactive drugs, and central venous catheter placement. The areas under the curve (AUC) of the training set and validation set were 0.83 and 0.80, respectively, and the calibration curve demonstrated satisfactory agreement between the two. Conclusion: This study has successfully constructed a prediction model for bloodstream infections associated with pneumonia cases, which has good stability and predictability and can help guide clinical work.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.