Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40171146›Full record

ArticleDigital health

Smart insole-based abnormal gait identification: Deep sequential networks and feature ablation study.

Beomjoon Park, Minhye Kim, Dawoon Jung, Jinwook Kim, Kyung-Ryoul Mun

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Digital health. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Beomjoon ParkIntelligence and Interaction Research Center, Korea Institute of Science and Technology, Seongbuk-gu, South Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0006-6589-0675
Minhye KimIntelligence and Interaction Research Center, Korea Institute of Science and Technology, Seongbuk-gu, South Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0005-6293-2000
Dawoon JungIntelligence and Interaction Research Center, Korea Institute of Science and Technology, Seongbuk-gu, South Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3612-7196
Jinwook KimIntelligence and Interaction Research Center, Korea Institute of Science and Technology, Seongbuk-gu, South Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6767-8914
Kyung-Ryoul MunIntelligence and Interaction Research Center, Korea Institute of Science and Technology, Seongbuk-gu, South Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5951-1014

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: Gait analysis plays a pivotal role in evaluating walking abilities, with recent advancements in digital health stressing the importance of efficient data collection methods. This study aims to classify nine gait types including one normal and eight abnormal gaits, using sequential network-based models and diverse feature combinations obtained from insole sensors. Methods: The dataset was collected using insole sensors from subjects performing 15 m walking with designated gait types. The sensors incorporated pressure sensors and inertial measurement units (IMUs), along with the center of pressure engineered from the pressure readings. A number of deep learning architectures were evaluated for their ability to classify the gait types, focusing on feature sets including temporal parameters, statistical features of pressure signals, center of pressure data, and IMU data. Ablation studies were also conducted to assess the impact of combining features from different modalities. Results: Our results demonstrate that models incorporating IMU features outperform those using different combinations of modalities including individual feature sets, with the top-performing models achieving F1-scores of up to 90% in sample-wise classification and 92% in subject-wise classification. Additionally, an ablation study reveals the importance of considering diverse feature modalities, including temporal parameters, statistical features from pressure signals, center of pressure data, and IMU data, for comprehensive gait classification. Conclusion: Overall, this study successfully developed deep sequential models that effectively classify nine different gait types, with the ablation study underscoring the potential for integrating features from diverse domains to enhance clinical applications, such as intervention for gait-related disorders.

Indexed as

Abnormal gaitdeep sequential networksfeature selectiongait analysisinsole sensors

Identifiers

PMID40171146
PMCPMC11960168

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.