ReviewClinical neuropsychiatry2025
Effectiveness of Non-Invasive Brain Stimulation (NIBS) in Overeating and Increased Body Mass Index (BMI): An Umbrella Review.
Review in Clinical neuropsychiatry, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Effectiveness of Non-Invasive Brain Stimulation (NIBS) in Overeating and Increased Body Mass Index (BMI): An Umbrella Review.Clinical neuropsychiatry · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This review of reviews aims to investigate the effectiveness of non-invasive brain stimulation (NIBS) methods, i.e., transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) and transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS), in reducing elevated body mass index (BMI) and overeating behavior (food cravings, binge eating, increased food consumption). Systematic reviews and meta-analyses in the English language were included. A search was conducted in PubMed and EMBASE until January 2024. The quality of all included reviews was assessed using the "A Measurement Tool to Assess Systematic Reviews" (AMSTAR-2). Quality assessment and data extraction were conducted by two independent reviewers, while all reviewers participated equally in article synthesis. Twenty-four systematic reviews were included, most of which show promising results regarding the effectiveness of NIBS on overeating and increased BMI . For weight reduction, rTMS is more effective, and tDCS can improve food cravings and food consumption. However, the critically low quality of most included studies and the heterogeneity of the intervention parameters are strong limitations against drawing any safe conclusions. More studies are needed with stable NIBS parameters.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.