Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40171066›Full record

ArticlePsychiatric research and clinical practice2025

Crisis Intervention Team Mental Health Training for Law Enforcement Officers: Protocol for a Multi-Site, Randomized, Controlled Trial.

Michael T Compton, Elisabeth Jackson, En Fu, Howard F Andrews, Ron Bruno, Erin Comartin, Hanga Galfalvy, Don Kamin, Leah G Pope, Eduardo Vega and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Psychiatric research and clinical practice, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Michael T ComptonDepartment of Psychiatry Columbia University Vagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons New York New York USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6835-2502
Elisabeth JacksonDepartment of Psychiatry Columbia University Vagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons New York New York USA.
En FuDepartment of Psychiatry Columbia University Vagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons New York New York USA.
Howard F AndrewsDepartment of Psychiatry Columbia University Vagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons New York New York USA.
Ron BrunoCTS Services, LLC Salt Lake City Utah USA.
Erin ComartinSchool of Social Work Wayne State University Detroit Michigan USA.
Hanga GalfalvyDepartment of Psychiatry Columbia University Vagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons New York New York USA.
Don KaminInstitute for Police, Mental Health & Community Collaboration at Coordinated Care Services, Inc. Rochester New York USA.
Leah G PopeNew York State Psychiatric Institute New York New York USA.
Eduardo VegaHumannovations Pasadena California USA.
Amy C WatsonSchool of Social Work Wayne State University Detroit Michigan USA.

Funding

A Randomized, Controlled Trial of Crisis Intervention Team (CIT) Mental Health Training for Police OfficersR01MH128500 · NIMH · COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI MICHAEL T COMPTON, Amy C Watson · 2023 to 2026
$2.6M
NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH128500
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: Although diverse strategies to reduce police involvement in mental health crisis response are emerging, people with serious mental illnesses and/or those experiencing a mental health crisis routinely encounter police. Officers need training to safely and effectively interact in these situations. The Crisis Intervention Team (CIT) model is a collaborative approach that includes a 40-h training of officers who self-select to become CIT officers. Despite widespread adoption across thousands of U.S. communities, no randomized, controlled trial (RCT) has assessed CIT training's effectiveness. Our objective is to determine the effectiveness of CIT training on officers' demonstrated skills and behaviors in three outcome areas: (1) verbal and non-verbal crisis de-escalation skills (the primary outcome), (2) officers' use of four domains of procedural justice, and (3) disposition-related decision-making. Hypothesized mediators and moderators will also be assessed. Methods: A total of approximately 240 officers from seven or eight U.S. sites will engage in video-recorded standardized scenarios at baseline, with half being randomized to receive CIT training within the following 3 weeks. Officers will then be reassessed at 3 and 6 months after the CIT training week. Trained raters, blinded to site, treatment arm, and timepoint, will evaluate the primary outcome. Survey-based data will capture officer characteristics and hypothesized mediators and moderators. Results: This study employs innovative methods, including standardized scenarios with professional actors portraying psychosis with agitation, depression with suicidality, and mania with refusal to leave, to measure officers' skills and behaviors. Conclusions: The multi-site RCT will yield generalizable, high-impact findings to inform policy and practice, addressing critical gaps in research on CIT training.

Identifiers

PMID40171066
PMCPMC11956719

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.