Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40171020›Full record

ArticleInterventional cardiology (London, England)2025

'RotaShock' - A Revolution in Calcium Modification: Long-term Follow-up from a Single High-volume Centre.

Jonathan Hinton, Rajesh Varma, Jehangir Din, Vivek Kodoth, Suneel Talwar, Peter O'Kane

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Interventional cardiology (London, England), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Comparative Analysis of Intravascular Lithotripsy With and Without Atherectomy in Severely Calcified Coronary Lesions Using OCT and OFDI.Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions : official journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions · 2025
    Article
  2. Review
  3. Combination Tools for Calcium Modification from RASER to Orbitalshock.Interventional cardiology (London, England) · 2024
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Jonathan HintonDorset Heart Centre, Royal Bournemouth Hospital Bournemouth, UK.
Rajesh VarmaDorset Heart Centre, Royal Bournemouth Hospital Bournemouth, UK.
Jehangir DinDorset Heart Centre, Royal Bournemouth Hospital Bournemouth, UK.
Vivek KodothDorset Heart Centre, Royal Bournemouth Hospital Bournemouth, UK.
Suneel TalwarDorset Heart Centre, Royal Bournemouth Hospital Bournemouth, UK.
Peter O'KaneDorset Heart Centre, Royal Bournemouth Hospital Bournemouth, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Rotational atherectomy (RA) and intravascular lithotripsy (IVL) are well-established technologies for modification of coronary calcification. Given their contrasting mechanisms of action, there has been interest in whether the use of these devices in conjunction could potentially be synergistic and offer improved procedural results. The aim of this study was therefore to evaluate the efficacy, procedural safety and long-term outcomes of combining RA and IVL, termed 'RotaShock' (RSK), for the treatment of severe coronary calcification. Methods: A single- centre retrospective analysis was carried out of consecutive patients treated with an RSK strategy for coronary calcification from January 2019 until September 2022. Baseline demographics, comorbidity details, details of the percutaneous coronary intervention procedure, angiographic and/or intracoronary imaging (ICI) results and presence of target vessel revascularisation or mortality were recorded. Results: A total of 36 patients were treated with RSK; the majority of patients were male (n=29; 80.6%) and the median age was 75 years (IQR 70-79 years). The majority of cases involved treating the left anterior descending artery (63.4%) but one-third involved percutaneous coronary intervention to the left main coronary artery. The vast majority of cases were guided by ICI (88.9%) and were performed through radial access (80.6%). In patients with ICI available for analysis, the median minimum stent area was 7.7 mm Conclusion: RSK is an effective and safe strategy for modification of severe coronary calcification, with long-term results suggesting a highly durable result. Further and randomised data are now mandated to evaluate the relative merits of RSK compared with RA or IVL alone.

Indexed as

coronary calcificationCoronary interventionintravascular lithotripsyrotational atherectomy

Identifiers

PMID40171020
PMCPMC11959477

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.