ArticleFrontiers in surgery2025
Clinical application of the tibial extension stem in primary TKA for knee varus deformity combined with tibial bone defect.
Article in Frontiers in surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- CT-based 3D planning-supported stem-free screw-cement augmentation versus 2D radiograph-planned short-stem reconstruction for AORI type I-II medial tibial defects in TKA: a two-year retrospective study.Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: To observe the clinical efficacy of prophylactic use of tibial extension stem in primary Total Knee Arthroplasty (TKA) in patients with severe knee varus deformity and tibial plateau bone defect, and its effect on reducing the rate of tibial prosthesis aseptic loosening. Methods: A total of 398 patients who underwent primary TKA in our hospital from August 2019 to June 2021 were collected. According to the strict inclusion/exclusion criteria, 55 patients with knee varus deformity (Hip-knee-ankle Angle, HKA ≤ 160°) and tibial bone defect were finally included. The tibial extension stem was used in 22 patients and standard tibial prosthesis was used in 33 patients. The general data, intraoperative parameters, preoperative and postoperative imaging parameters and knee function scores (KSS) were analyzed. The incidence of tibial prosthesis aseptic loosening, KSS score, radiological evaluation of the prosthesis and bone cement screws, and postoperative general complications were dynamically followed up and evaluated. Results: All 55 patients completed long-term follow-up, with an average follow-up time of 46.1 ± 4.2 months. There was no significant difference in HKA Angle between the two groups before and after operation ( Conclusions: For patients with severe knee varus deformity and tibial plateau bone defect, the use of tibial extension stem in primary TKA may have a protective effect on the survival rate of prosthesis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.