ReviewNational science review2025
How to accelerate the inorganic materials synthesis: from computational guidelines to data-driven method?
Review in National science review, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Machine Learning Accelerates Crystallization for Structure Determination.Angewandte Chemie (International ed. in English) · 2026Article
- Continuous discovery of novel 2D materials via dual active learning-driven generative models.National science review · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The development of novel functional materials has attracted widespread attention to meet the constantly growing demand for addressing the major global challenges facing humanity, among which experimental synthesis emerges as one of the crucial challenges. Understanding the synthesis processes and predicting the outcomes of synthesis experiments are essential for increasing the success rate of experiments. With the advancements in computational power and the emergence of machine learning (ML) techniques, computational guidelines and data-driven methods have significantly contributed to accelerating and optimizing material synthesis. Herein, a review of the latest progress on the computation-guided and ML-assisted inorganic material synthesis is presented. First, common synthesis methods for inorganic materials are introduced, followed by a discussion of physical models based on thermodynamics and kinetics, which are relevant to the synthesis feasibility of inorganic materials. Second, data acquisition, commonly utilized material descriptors, and ML techniques in ML-assisted inorganic material synthesis are discussed. Third, applications of ML techniques in inorganic material synthesis are presented, which are classified according to different material data sources. Finally, we highlight the crucial challenges and promising opportunities for ML-assisted inorganic materials synthesis. This review aims to provide critical scientific guidance for future advancements in ML-assisted inorganic materials synthesis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.