Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40170982›Full record

ArticleJornal vascular brasileiro2025

Variations in the branching pattern of the internal iliac artery and its implications in trauma and surgery - a South Indian cadaveric study.

Satheesha Nayak Badagabettu, Ashwini Aithal Padur, Surekha Devadasa Shetty

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Jornal vascular brasileiro, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Satheesha Nayak BadagabettuManipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal, Karnataka, India.
Ashwini Aithal PadurManipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal, Karnataka, India.ORCID 0000-0003-1298-6746
Surekha Devadasa ShettyManipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal, Karnataka, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: The internal iliac artery (IIA) frequently shows variations in its branching pattern. Knowledge of its variations is helpful during gynecological and orthopedic surgical procedures. Objectives: To observe the branching pattern of IIA in the human pelvises and discuss its clinical implications. Methods: The study was conducted on 80 male hemipelvises (40 left halves and 40 right halves). The pelvic halves were obtained by making mid-line saw cuts through formalin embalmed adult human cadavers aged approximately 50-80 years. The IIA were dissected and cleaned. Variations of the internal iliac artery and its branches were noted. Relevant photographs were taken. Results were expressed as percentages. Results: Variations in the branching pattern were observed in 49 (61%) hemipelvises (right: 21, left: 28). Variations were more common (48%) in the branching pattern of the anterior division of IIA than the posterior division (20%). Variations of the main trunk were observed in 29% of cases. In 3% of cases, the IIA did not divide into two divisions. Among the individual branches, the iliolumbar artery showed variations in 29% of cases and the obturator artery in 25%. A common trunk of the internal pudendal and middle rectal arteries was found in 24% of cases and variations of the inferior gluteal artery were seen in 18% of cases. Conclusions: The study showed a high rate of occurrence of variant IIA branching patterns. Understanding the anatomical variations of the IIA and its branches is essential to minimize intraoperative blood loss and other complications during pelvic surgeries.

Indexed as

iliolumbar arteryinternal iliac arteryobturator arterypelvisvascular variation

Identifiers

PMID40170982
PMCPMC11961128

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.