Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40170972›Full record

ArticleJournal of applied crystallography2025

Benchmarking deep learning for automated peak detection on GIWAXS data.

Constantin Völter, Vladimir Starostin, Dmitry Lapkin, Valentin Munteanu, Mikhail Romodin, Maik Hylinski, Alexander Gerlach, Alexander Hinderhofer, Frank Schreiber

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of applied crystallography, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Journal of applied crystallography · 2026
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Constantin VölterInstitute of Applied Physics - University of Tübingen Auf der Morgenstelle 10 72076Tübingen Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0001-2690-4468
Vladimir StarostinCluster of Excellence 'Machine learning - new perspectives for science'University of Tübingen Maria-von-Linden-Straße 6 72076Tübingen Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4533-6256
Dmitry LapkinInstitute of Applied Physics - University of Tübingen Auf der Morgenstelle 10 72076Tübingen Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0680-8740
Valentin MunteanuInstitute of Applied Physics - University of Tübingen Auf der Morgenstelle 10 72076Tübingen Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5897-3863
Mikhail RomodinInstitute of Applied Physics - University of Tübingen Auf der Morgenstelle 10 72076Tübingen Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0005-4073-9859
Maik HylinskiInstitute of Applied Physics - University of Tübingen Auf der Morgenstelle 10 72076Tübingen Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0009-6132-4002
Alexander GerlachInstitute of Applied Physics - University of Tübingen Auf der Morgenstelle 10 72076Tübingen Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1787-1868
Alexander HinderhoferInstitute of Applied Physics - University of Tübingen Auf der Morgenstelle 10 72076Tübingen Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8152-6386
Frank SchreiberInstitute of Applied Physics - University of Tübingen Auf der Morgenstelle 10 72076Tübingen Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3659-6718

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Recent advancements in X-ray sources and detectors have dramatically increased data generation, leading to a greater demand for automated data processing. This is particularly relevant for real-time grazing-incidence wide-angle X-ray scattering (GIWAXS) experiments which can produce hundreds of thousands of diffraction images in a single day at a synchrotron beamline. Deep learning (DL)-based peak-detection techniques are becoming prominent in this field, but rigorous benchmarking is essential to evaluate their reliability, identify potential problems, explore avenues for improvement and build confidence among researchers for seamless integration into their workflows. However, the systematic evaluation of these techniques has been hampered by the lack of annotated GIWAXS datasets, standardized metrics and baseline models. To address these challenges, we introduce a comprehensive framework comprising an annotated experimental dataset, physics-informed metrics adapted to the GIWAXS geometry and a competitive baseline - a classical, non-DL peak-detection algorithm optimized on our dataset. Furthermore, we apply our framework to benchmark a recent DL solution trained on simulated data and discover its superior performance compared with our baseline. This analysis not only highlights the effectiveness of DL methods for identifying diffraction peaks but also provides insights for further development of these solutions.

Indexed as

convolutional neural networksdeep learningFaster R-CNNGIWAXSgrazing-incidence wide-angle X-ray scatteringpeak detection

Identifiers

PMID40170972
PMCPMC11957406

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.