Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40170938›Full record

ReviewThe Canadian veterinary journal = La revue veterinaire canadienne2025

Steven Roche, David Renaud, Murray Gillies, Diego Nobrega, Doris Leung

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in The Canadian veterinary journal = La revue veterinaire canadienne, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Cross-species genomic analysis ofOne health (Amsterdam, Netherlands) · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Steven RocheACER Consulting, 100 Stone Road West #101, Guelph, Ontario N1G 5L3 (Roche, Renaud); Department of Population Medicine, Ontario Veterinary College, University of Guelph, 50 Stone Road East, Guelph, Ontario N1G 2W1 (Renaud); Canadian Animal Health Surveillance System, Animal Health Canada, Elora, Ontario N0B 1S0 (Gillies, Leung); Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Calgary, 3280 Hospital Drive NW, Calgary, Alberta T2N 4Z6 (Nobrega).
David RenaudACER Consulting, 100 Stone Road West #101, Guelph, Ontario N1G 5L3 (Roche, Renaud); Department of Population Medicine, Ontario Veterinary College, University of Guelph, 50 Stone Road East, Guelph, Ontario N1G 2W1 (Renaud); Canadian Animal Health Surveillance System, Animal Health Canada, Elora, Ontario N0B 1S0 (Gillies, Leung); Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Calgary, 3280 Hospital Drive NW, Calgary, Alberta T2N 4Z6 (Nobrega).
Murray GilliesACER Consulting, 100 Stone Road West #101, Guelph, Ontario N1G 5L3 (Roche, Renaud); Department of Population Medicine, Ontario Veterinary College, University of Guelph, 50 Stone Road East, Guelph, Ontario N1G 2W1 (Renaud); Canadian Animal Health Surveillance System, Animal Health Canada, Elora, Ontario N0B 1S0 (Gillies, Leung); Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Calgary, 3280 Hospital Drive NW, Calgary, Alberta T2N 4Z6 (Nobrega).
Diego NobregaACER Consulting, 100 Stone Road West #101, Guelph, Ontario N1G 5L3 (Roche, Renaud); Department of Population Medicine, Ontario Veterinary College, University of Guelph, 50 Stone Road East, Guelph, Ontario N1G 2W1 (Renaud); Canadian Animal Health Surveillance System, Animal Health Canada, Elora, Ontario N0B 1S0 (Gillies, Leung); Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Calgary, 3280 Hospital Drive NW, Calgary, Alberta T2N 4Z6 (Nobrega).
Doris LeungACER Consulting, 100 Stone Road West #101, Guelph, Ontario N1G 5L3 (Roche, Renaud); Department of Population Medicine, Ontario Veterinary College, University of Guelph, 50 Stone Road East, Guelph, Ontario N1G 2W1 (Renaud); Canadian Animal Health Surveillance System, Animal Health Canada, Elora, Ontario N0B 1S0 (Gillies, Leung); Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Calgary, 3280 Hospital Drive NW, Calgary, Alberta T2N 4Z6 (Nobrega).

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Objective animal and procedure: The objective of this narrative literature review was to provide an overview of the epidemiology of Results: Approximately 3 to 30% of dairy farms are positive for Conclusion and clinical relevance:

Indexed as

Cattle DiseasesSalmonellaSalmonella entericaSalmonella Infections, AnimalAnimalsCanadaCattleDairyingFemaleRisk Factors

Identifiers

PMID40170938
PMCPMC11932371

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.