ArticleJHEP reports : innovation in hepatology2025
QuickStroop for screening for minimal hepatic encephalopathy in patients with cirrhosis.
Article in JHEP reports : innovation in hepatology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Covert hepatic encephalopathy as a multi-organ syndrome: the gut-liver-muscle-brain axis, diagnosis, treatment, and multidisciplinary care.Journal of gastroenterology · 2026Review
- Impact of liver cirrhosis etiology on results of diagnostic tests for minimal hepatic encephalopathy.Scientific reports · 2026Observational
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background & Aims: QuickStroop, a shortened version of the Stroop EncephalApp, has recently been proposed for screening for minimal hepatic encephalopathy (MHE) in patients with cirrhosis in the USA. At present, there are no data on its clinical utility for MHE screening in patients in Europe, and only limited data are available regarding its comparison to the Animal Naming Test (ANT). Methods: In total, 242 patients with cirrhosis without signs of hepatic encephalopathy (HE) ≥ grade 1 and no history of overt HE were included as the development cohort. Another independent cohort comprising 104 patients with cirrhosis from a different center served as a validation set. MHE was defined using the psychometric hepatic encephalopathy score (PHES) (PHES-MHE). All patients were tested with the complete EncephalApp Stroop. A subset was also tested with the ANT. Regression formulas were fitted for patients above and below the age of 60 years, including the first two off-state runs, age, and school education (QuickStroop). Results: PHES-MHE was detected in 76 (31%) patients. The first two off-state runs of the EncephalApp demonstrated a comparable discriminative ability to the complete Stroop test in distinguishing between patients with and without PHES-MHE. QuickStroop had a better discriminative ability in patients below than above the age of 60 years. The discriminative ability of QuickStroop (total cohort: AUC 0.88) was superior to ANT (AUC 0.70). QuickStroop predicted PHES-MHE with a sensitivity of 74% and a specificity of 89%, and took a median of only 34.5 s to complete. The acceptable discriminative ability of QuickStroop was confirmed in the validation cohort (AUC 0.81). Conclusion: QuickStroop is a rapid screening tool to identify patients at risk for PHES-MHE, especially in patients below 60 years of age. Impact and implications: QuickStroop, a shortened version of the Stroop EncephalApp, has recently been proposed for screening for MHE in patients with cirrhosis in the USA. In this study, we validated QuickStroop for patients in Germany with cirrhosis and demonstrate a good diagnostic accuracy for detecting MHE, especially in patients below 60 years of age. Additionally, QuickStroop might be superior to the ANT in patients below 60 years of age. The use of QuickStroop in clinical practice could facilitate screening for MHE.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.