ArticleClinical medicine insights. Case reports2025
Bilateral Renal Infarction, a Rare Consequence of Blunt Renal Artery Injury: A Case Report.
Article in Clinical medicine insights. Case reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Renal infarction is an uncommon complication of Blunt renal artery injury (BRAI) following abdominal trauma. Diagnosis of infarction is difficult and mostly delayed due to non-specific symptoms. Early diagnosis can lead to appropriate and effective treatment, which prevents further complication. Case presentation: We report a case of 21-year-old man falling from a height of 9 m. A contrast-enhanced CT scan in the nephrogram phase showed no evidence of absorption in the right kidney and significantly decreased absorption in the left kidney. The pyelogram phase showed no secretion in the right kidney and decreased secretion in the left kidney suggesting segmental renal infarction. Subsequently, heparin infusion was initiated immediately. A follow-up contrast- enhanced abdominopelvic CT scan was performed after 1 month and showed no sign of infarction, and all laboratory tests were normal. Conclusion: Contrast-enhanced abdominopelvic CT scan helps physicians diagnose the renal infarction immediately and start appropriate treatment. Treatment can vary from aggressive surgical procedures to observation and supportive care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.