ArticleFrontiers in immunology2025
Identification of prognostic subtypes and the role of FXYD6 in ovarian cancer through multi-omics clustering.
Article in Frontiers in immunology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Ovarian cancer (OC), as a malignant tumor that seriously endangers the lives and health of women, is renowned for its complex tumor heterogeneity. Multi-omics analysis, as an effective method for distinguishing tumor heterogeneity, can more accurately differentiate the prognostic subtypes with differences among patients with OC. The aim of this study is to explore the prognostic subtypes of OC and analyze the molecular characteristics among the different subtypes. Methods: We utilized 10 clustering algorithms to analyze the multi-omics data of OC patients from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA). After that, we integrated them with ten different machine-learning methods in order to determine high-resolution molecular subgroups and generate machine-learning-driven characteristics that are both resilient and consensus-based. Following the application of multi-omics clustering, we were able to identify two cancer subtypes (CSs) that were associated with the prognosis. Among these, CS2 demonstrated the most positive predictive outcome. Subsequently, five genes that constitute the machine learning (ML)-driven features were screened out by ML algorithms, and these genes possess a powerful predictive ability for prognosis. Subsequently, the function of FXYD Domain-Containing Ion Transport Regulator 6 (FXYD6) in OC was analyzed through gene knockdown and overexpression, and the mechanism by which it affects the functions of OC was explored. Results: Through multi-omics analysis, we ascertained that the high-risk score group exhibits a poorer prognosis and lack of response to immunotherapy. Moreover, this group is more prone to display the "cold tumor" phenotype, with a lower likelihood of benefiting from immunotherapy. FXYD6, being a crucial differential molecule between subtypes, exerts a tumor-promoting effect when knocked down; conversely, its overexpression yields an opposite outcome. Additionally, we discovered that the overexpression of FXYD6 can induce ferroptosis in OC cells, implying that a low level of FXYD6 in OC cells can safeguard them from ferroptosis. Insightful and more precise molecular categorization of OC can be achieved with a thorough examination of multi-omics data. There are significant consequences for clinical practice stemming from the discovery of risk scores since they provide a useful tool for early prognosis prediction as well as the screening of candidates for immunotherapy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.