Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40170811›Full record

ArticleEcology and evolution2025

Evaluating LiDAR-Derived Structural Metrics for Predicting Bee Assemblages in Managed Forests.

Marissa H Chase, Alexandra Harmon-Threatt, Samuel F Stickley, Brian Charles, Jennifer M Fraterrigo

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Ecology and evolution, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Marissa H ChaseDepartment of Natural Resources and Environmental Sciences University of Illinois Urbana Illinois USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4878-6658
Alexandra Harmon-ThreattDepartment of Entomology University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign Urbana Illinois USA.
Samuel F StickleyDepartment of Natural Resources and Environmental Sciences University of Illinois Urbana Illinois USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0811-9236
Brian CharlesIllinois Natural History Survey Champaign Illinois USA.
Jennifer M FraterrigoDepartment of Natural Resources and Environmental Sciences University of Illinois Urbana Illinois USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Globally, many insects depend on forest habitat for critical nesting and floral resources. Forest structural complexity can affect the distribution of these resources and likewise alter insect assemblages within forests. Despite the importance of temperate deciduous forests for bees and their outsized contribution to pollination services within forests and beyond, the relationship between forest structure and bees has received scant attention. This is especially true in managed temperate deciduous forests, where management strategies alter forest structural complexity and may therefore affect bee communities. We investigated whether structural metrics derived from light detection and ranging (LiDAR) data could predict bee diversity and abundance, as well as bee functional trait composition within managed and unmanaged forests in the central hardwood region in southern Illinois, United States of America. We addressed three specific questions: (1) How does forest management affect structural complexity; (2) Can structural metrics predict bee diversity and abundance in spring and summer; and (3) How are structural metrics related to bee functional trait composition? We found that LiDAR-derived structural metrics could not differentiate between management types and were weak predictors of bee diversity and abundance and bee functional trait composition. Metrics related to understory and midstory vegetation structure showed the strongest association with forest bee community patterns. Specifically, vegetation density in the understory (0-2 m) had a positive effect on bee diversity and abundance in spring, while in summer, vegetation density in the mid-canopy (2-5 m) negatively affected bee communities. Our findings suggest mid- and understory vegetation structure, specifically vegetation density, may influence forest bee communities. Future studies should focus on the structural elements of these forest strata to improve understanding of how structural complexity influences bee communities within managed forests and evaluate the potential for using LiDAR-derived structural metrics to monitor and predict biodiversity patterns.

Indexed as

beesforest ecology and managementLiDARremote sensingstructural complexity

Identifiers

PMID40170811
PMCPMC11949573

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.