ArticleClinics in orthopedic surgery2025
Does Hip Abduction during Intramedullary Nail Fixation Help Correct Residual Varus Alignment in Subtrochanteric Fractures? A Retrospective Cohort Study.
Article in Clinics in orthopedic surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Comparative study on the clinical efficacy of femoral neck system and cannulated cancellous screw in the treatment of femoral neck fractures in young patients.BMC musculoskeletal disorders · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Varus malalignment is a risk factor for nonunion and mechanical complications in subtrochanteric femoral fractures (SFFs). Although various reduction techniques have been reported to avoid varus malalignment in SFFs, achieving anatomic reduction remains challenging, often resulting in residual varus alignment (RVA) after reduction. This study aimed to investigate the radiographic and clinical outcomes of a novel method resolving RVA by abducting the ipsilateral hip after cephalomedullary fixation with an intramedullary nail and subsequently inserting distal interlocking screws. Methods: This retrospective study, conducted between March 2016 and March 2022, included patients who underwent hip abduction during intramedullary nailing due to RVA. Demographics and fracture patterns (Arbeitsgemeinschaft fur Osteosynthesefragen/Orthopedic Trauma Association [AO/OTA]) and types (typical or atypical) were analyzed. Radiographic outcomes included Baumgaertner reduction quality criteria (BRQC), tip-apex distance (TAD), neck-shaft angle (NSA), lateral cortex residual gap, union, and time to union. Clinical outcomes included ambulatory level using the Palmer-Parker Mobility Score (PPM), complications, and reoperation. Results: This study included 45 patients (mean age, 65.8 years; mean follow-up period, 18.4 months). The most common fracture pattern was 32A2 in 15 patients and 29 were typical and 16 were atypical fractures. The BRQC was good in 36 patients, and TAD was < 25 mm in 43 patients. Pre-abduction NSA (126.0° ± 3.8°) was significantly smaller than post-abduction NSA (129.9° ± 3.4°, Conclusions: Hip abduction during intramedullary nailing corrects alignment and reduces the gap in SFFs with residual varus alignment. This method can be applied to various fracture patterns in a straightforward manner and considered valuable for managing SFFs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.