ArticleClinics in orthopedic surgery2025
Distal Biceps Brachii Rupture.
Article in Clinics in orthopedic surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Common weightlifting injuries of the upper extremity.Skeletal radiology · 2026Review
- Conservative versus operative treatment of distal biceps tendon ruptures in young and active patients.International orthopaedics · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Backgroud: Distal biceps tendon ruptures are rare injuries that predominantly affect active men between the fourth and sixth decades, with a higher incidence in weightlifters and bodybuilders. This study aimed to comprehensively review cases involving distal biceps tendon ruptures, focusing on sociodemographic factors (such as sex, age, occupation, and smoking status), injury mechanisms, postoperative outcomes, and recorded complications. Methods: This retrospective review examines distal biceps injuries at Royal Berkshire Foundation Trust NHS Hospital from 2017 to 2023. Analyzed data encompasses demographic information, injury mechanisms, clinical findings, and complications. Outcomes were assessed using the range of movement and Elbow Oxford Score. Results: The average age of 73 patients (72 men and 1 woman) was 45.6 ± 9.4 years, with 75.3% falling between 36 and 55 years. Manual workers represented 46.6%, and 9.6% reported comorbidities and 6.8% steroid use. Lifting heavy objects and sports injuries were the predominant causes, constituting 43.8% and 13.7%, respectively. Most injuries (91.8%) involved complete tears, and most underwent acute surgery within the initial 4 weeks (84.9%). The most common complications were heterotopic ossification (23.3%) and neurological injury (16.4%). Ongoing weakness and fatigue were reported by 6.8%. At final follow-up, 75.7% of patients demonstrated a range of movement comparable to the contralateral side. However, 13.7% had a limited pronation-supination arch with a mean loss of 20° ± 14°, 11% had an extension lag with a mean of 15° ± 7°, and 2.7% showed a 10° flexion loss compared to the contralateral side. Conclusions: Distal biceps injuries are rare but lead to substantial functional loss without operative treatment. Surgical repair yields positive functional outcomes. Our study aligns with existing literature, emphasizing a predominance of middle-aged men and manual workers. It underscores the impact of corticosteroids and smoking, highlights surgical efficacy, and advocates for increased research in distal biceps injury prevention and treatment understanding.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.