Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40170772›Full record

ArticleClinics in orthopedic surgery2025

En Bloc Resection of Thoracic and Upper Lumbar Spinal Tumors Using a Novel Rotation-Reversion Technique through Posterior-Only Approach.

Ming Lu, Changhe Hou, Wei Chen, Zixiong Lei, Shuangwu Dai, Shaohua Du, Qinglin Jin, Dadi Jin, Haomiao Li

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinics in orthopedic surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Total en bloc spondylectomy with artificial vertebral body replacement for thoracic spinal hydatidosis with hepatic involvement: a case report and literature review.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2026
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Ming LuDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Jinan University, Guangzhou, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1701-9133
Changhe HouDepartment of Musculoskeletal Oncology, Center for Orthopedic Surgery, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7994-3754
Wei ChenDepartment of Musculoskeletal Oncology, Center for Orthopedic Surgery, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0003-9326-2666
Zixiong LeiDepartment of Musculoskeletal Oncology, Center for Orthopedic Surgery, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0000-8608-4361
Shuangwu DaiDepartment of Musculoskeletal Oncology, Center for Orthopedic Surgery, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1329-0345
Shaohua DuDepartment of Musculoskeletal Oncology, Center for Orthopedic Surgery, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0543-4487
Qinglin JinDepartment of Musculoskeletal Oncology, Center for Orthopedic Surgery, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5728-2684
Dadi JinDepartment of Musculoskeletal Oncology, Center for Orthopedic Surgery, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9448-2615
Haomiao LiDepartment of Musculoskeletal Oncology, Center for Orthopedic Surgery, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9629-790X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: En bloc resection is recommended for the treatment of malignant and aggressive benign spinal tumors; however, it often requires a combined anterior-posterior approach, which is usually accompanied by longer surgical duration, increased blood loss, larger trauma, and surgical complexity. The present study describes a novel rotation-reversion technique for en bloc resection of the thoracic and upper lumbar spinal tumors using a posterior-only approach and evaluate its safety and efficacy. Methods: Thirteen patients with thoracic and upper lumbar (L1-L3) spinal tumors were treated with en bloc resection using the rotation-reversion technique through a posterior-only approach at our institution between 2015 and 2023. The clinical characteristics and surgical results of the patients were reviewed and analyzed. Results: Posterior-only en bloc resection was performed successfully in all 13 patients using the rotation-reversion technique, with a median follow-up of 30.4 months (range, 6-74 months). The average maximum size of these 13 tumors was 5.7 × 5.8 × 4.8 cm. The mean operation time and blood loss were 458.5 minutes (range, 220-880 minutes) and 3,146.2 mL (range, 1,000-6,000 mL), respectively, with 4 of the 13 patients (30.8%) experiencing perioperative complications. Negative margins were achieved in all the 13 patients (100%). One patient experienced local recurrence (7.7%) and 1 patient experienced instrumentation failures. Interbody fusion was confirmed in 11 of the 13 patients (84.6%), with a median fusion time of 6.9 months. All of the 13 patients experienced varying degrees of mild postoperative neurological deficits owing to resection of the nerve roots affected by tumor invasion of the vertebrae. No vessel injury or postoperative neurological paralysis occurred, except 1 patient who had been completely paralyzed before surgery. Conclusions: The rotation-reversion technique is an effective procedure for en bloc resection of selected thoracic and upper lumbar spinal tumors through the posterior-only approach.

Indexed as

Lumbar VertebraeSpinal NeoplasmsThoracic VertebraeAdultAgedBlood Loss, SurgicalFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedOperative TimeRetrospective StudiesRotationYoung AdultEn bloc resectionSpinal tumorSurgical marginSurgical resectionSurgical technique

Identifiers

PMID40170772
PMCPMC11957812

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.