ArticleClinics in orthopedic surgery2025
The Challenge of Trans-Ulnar Basal Coronoid Fracture-Dislocations: A Surgical Strategy Based on the Pattern of Coronoid Fracture.
Article in Clinics in orthopedic surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Backgroud: The rarity and complexity of trans-ulnar basal coronoid fracture-dislocations pose significant challenges in treatment. This study aimed to categorize these fractures based on coronoid fracture patterns and propose tailored surgical approaches for each type. Additionally, we evaluated the functional and radiological outcomes among the patients managed using our treatment algorithm. Methods: A total of 19 patients who underwent open reduction and internal fixation for trans-ulnar basal coronoid fracture-dislocations between March 2018 and October 2022 were enrolled in this study. These patients were classified based on the coronoid fracture patterns associated with olecranon fractures: type 1 involved anteromedial facet (AMF) fractures, type 2 encompassed coronoid base and body fractures, and type 3 involved a combination of types 1 and 2. We made a midline longitudinal dorsal incision to facilitate the provisional fixation of the olecranon fragment to the distal metaphysis using a locking plate. Subsequently, we employed the over-the-top (type 1) and Taylor-Scham (type 3) approaches for direct coronoid process fixation with buttress plating. Type 2 fractures were approached via medial fascial exposure from the posterior ulnar cortex or through the olecranon fractures, and subsequently fixed with miniplates and screws. Bony union and joint articulation were assessed via plain radiographs, and functional outcomes were evaluated using range of motion and the Mayo Elbow Performance Score. Results: Among the 19 patients, 3 had type 1 fractures, 14 had type 2 fractures, and 2 had type 3 fractures. All fractures exhibited solid osseous union without subluxation or dislocation. The average flexion and extension arc was 119.47° ± 20.88°, with a mean flexion of 127.37° ± 13.37° and an average flexion contracture of 7.89° ± 10.04°. The average Mayo Elbow Performance Score was 82.63 ± 12.51 points. Qualitatively, patient outcomes were excellent in 5 patients, good in 9, and fair in 5. Conclusions: Most of our patients presented with easily approachable coronoid base and body fractures. However, in AMF fractures of the coronoid process, a direct medial approach is required for buttress plating. We believe our study helps provide useful guidelines for making appropriate decisions in trans-ulnar basal coronoid fracture-dislocations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.