ArticleCureus2025
Risk Factors of Mortality in Patients With Periprosthetic Fractures: An Experience of 100 Cases.
Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Operative treatment is associated with improved 3-year survival after periprosthetic humerus fracture.JSES international · 2026Article
- Multicenter Study of Comorbidities in Patients with Periprosthetic Fractures After Total Hip Arthroplasty and Their Association with Immediate Postoperative Complications.Clinics and practice · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveThis study aims to determine the frequency and risk factors of mortality in patients with periprosthetic fractures. MATERIALS AND
methodsA retrospective review was conducted on 100 patients with periprosthetic fractures around hip and knee replacements. Inclusion criteria were radiological evidence of fracture and age >65 years. Exclusions included prior surgically treated fractures, fractures due to malignancy, lost follow-up, or unavailable postoperative data. Patients were analyzed for postoperative fracture union, complications, and mobility status using clinical and radiographic data. Data were analyzed using R software version 4.3.3 (R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria), employing chi-square and Mann-Whitney U tests for categorical and numerical data, respectively, with logistic regression to control for confounders.
resultsThe mean time to operation was 3.25 ± 1.11 days. Among 100 patients, the mean age was 82.22 ± 6.90 years, with a slight male predominance n = 58 (58%). Hip fractures were more common (n = 73; 73%), with knee fractures comprising n = 27 (27%). Most patients were treated at district general hospitals (DGHs) (n = 86; 86%). Mortality within six months was n = 17 (17%). No significant gender differences in mortality were found (p = 0.3). Age >81 years was associated with higher mortality (p = 0.04). Nonoperative management was linked to higher mortality (p = 0.003). No significant differences were observed between hip and knee fracture mortality rates (p = 0.8) or across fracture complexity (p = 0.5). Multivariate analysis indicated higher mortality for nonoperated patients (OR: 0.18, p = 0.004).
conclusionAge and operative management significantly impacted mortality in periprosthetic fractures. Older age (≥81 years) and nonoperative management were linked to higher mortality rates.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.