Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40170716›Full record

ArticleJournal of experimental orthopaedics2025

Impact of contralateral pelvic drop and femoral adduction on the femoral head acetabular coverage: A study on the reproducibility of a new radiographic measurement method.

Renato Locks, Eliane C Guadagnin, Guilherme Pradi Adam, Felipe F Gonzalez, Jorge Chahla, Liszt Palmeira de Oliveira, Leonardo Metsavaht, Gustavo Leporace

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of experimental orthopaedics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Renato LocksInstituto Brasil de Tecnologias da Saúde Rio de Janeiro Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-8370-5836
Eliane C GuadagninInstituto Brasil de Tecnologias da Saúde Rio de Janeiro Brazil.ORCID 0000-0003-3250-4134
Guilherme Pradi AdamClínica Imagem, Florianópolis Brazil.ORCID 0000-0003-2220-8913
Felipe F GonzalezInstituto Brasil de Tecnologias da Saúde Rio de Janeiro Brazil.ORCID 0000-0001-7142-6031
Jorge ChahlaRUSH University Medical Center USA.ORCID 0000-0002-9194-1150
Liszt Palmeira de OliveiraPrograma de Pós-Graduação em Ciências Médicas Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-9051-937X
Leonardo MetsavahtInstituto Brasil de Tecnologias da Saúde Rio de Janeiro Brazil.ORCID 0000-0001-9263-1309
Gustavo LeporaceInstituto Brasil de Tecnologias da Saúde Rio de Janeiro Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-7265-4658

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: Traditional radiographic measurements for acetabular dysplasia and femoroacetabular impingement syndrome (FAIS) are typically done in static positions, overlooking dynamic behaviours. This study investigated the reproducibility of a new radiographic method that incorporates pelvic and femoral motion during running. Methods: This cross-sectional retrospective study included 10 patients (5 males/5 females; Mean 42.4, SD: 3.0 years) with symptomatic unilateral FAIS. Participants underwent three-dimensional running analysis and standard supine anteroposterior (AP) pelvis radiographs. Using specialised software, the femur and pelvis were rotated in the coronal plane according to peak angles of contralateral pelvic drop and femoral adduction from the running analysis, preserving the original hip joint centre. Two experienced physicians measured the lateral centre edge angle (LCEA), acetabular index (AI), sharp angle (SA), extrusion index (EI), and femoro-epiphyseal acetabular roof index (FEAR INDEX) on both standard and manipulated (M) radiographs in two rounds, with a 15-day interval. Differences between the original and manipulated measurements (VAR) were also calculated. Intra- and inter-rater reliability were assessed using the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and Bland-Altman method, with a significance level of 5%. Results: The average contralateral pelvic drop and femoral adduction used for image manipulation were 4.7° (SD: 2.7) and 6.2° (SD: 2.4), respectively. Of the 15 radiographic measurements, 14 showed good to excellent inter-rater reliability in the first assessment (range: 0.76-0.98), which decreased to 11 in the second assessment (range: 0.80-0.96). Intra-rater reliability showed 13 and 12 measurements with good or excellent reliability for raters 1 (range: 0.75-0.97) and 2 (range: 0.79-0.97), respectively. Conclusion: This study demonstrates that incorporating dynamic motion into femoral head acetabular coverage radiographic measurements provides potential reliable assessments for most parameters. Integrating motion analysis with radiography could improve understanding of acetabular coverage in active individuals and support surgical decision-making. Level of evidence: Diagnostic Study, Level III.

Indexed as

biomechanicsborderline dysplasiafemoroacetabular impingementgaitreliability

Identifiers

PMID40170716
PMCPMC11959493

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.