ArticleJournal of experimental orthopaedics2025
Knee focal cartilage defect location heat map and local surface morphology characterisation: Insights for focal knee resurfacing implant design.
Article in Journal of experimental orthopaedics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- The Impact of Aging on Meniscal Tears and Chondral Lesions in Men: Insights from First-Time Arthroscopic Knee Evaluation.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Knee focal cartilage defect location heat map and local surface morphology characterisation: Insights for focal knee resurfacing implant design.Journal of experimental orthopaedics · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: The objective of this work was to characterise the dimensions of knee focal cartilage defects, generate a heat map of cartilage defect locations, and characterise the native articular surface morphology at the most common defect sites to aid in the design of generic focal knee resurfacing implants (FKRIs). Methods: Healthy femoral cartilage was segmented from knee magnetic resonance imaging scans of 70 patients eligible for FKRI surgery. Cartilage defects were manually reconstructed to create three-dimensional (3D) native cartilage and cartilage defect models. A 3D statistical shape model of the native cartilage was created and 200 artificial models with varying shapes were generated. A heat map showing the frequency of defect occurrence location was created, and the size and aspect ratio of the defects were determined. Local radii of curvature were calculated at five locations that exhibit high defect occurrence for the medial and lateral condyles and in the trochlear groove. Results: The median defect size and aspect ratio were 2.7 and 1.6, respectively. Cartilage defect location frequency heat maps were successfully generated for the medial and lateral condyles. The median mediolateral and anteroposterior radius of curvature at the medial condyle hotspot were 17.5 mm and 40.8 mm respectively, and 22.6 mm and 33.8 mm at the lateral condyle hotspot. Conclusions: Characteristics of knee focal cartilage defect properties such as the size, their spatial distribution and local articular cartilage surface morphology offer valuable insights for the design of generic FKRIs. Level of Evidence: Level IV.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.