ArticleJournal of experimental orthopaedics2025
The top 100 most-cited knee osteotomy publications.
Article in Journal of experimental orthopaedics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- The top 100 most-cited publications on osteochondral lesions of the ankle: A bibliometric analysis.Journal of experimental orthopaedics · 2026Article
- The top 100 most-cited knee osteotomy publications.Journal of experimental orthopaedics · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: To objectively identify the 100 most influential scientific publications in knee osteotomy and provide an analysis of their main characteristics. Methods: The Clarivate Analytics Web of Knowledge database was used to obtain data and metrics on knee osteotomy research. The search list was sorted by the number of citations, and articles were included or excluded based on relevance to knee osteotomy. The information extracted for each article included the author's name, publication year, country of origin, journal name, article type and the level of evidence. Results: These 100 studies generated a total of 16,246 citations, with an average of 162.5 citations per article. The most-cited article was cited 752 times. The 100 studies included in this analysis were published between 1976 and 2015. Twenty-one different journals published these 100 publications. The majority of the publications were from the United States ( Conclusion: The 100 most influential publications in knee osteotomy were cited a total of 16,246 times. The study designs most used were case series and cohort studies with low-level evidence. This publication serves as a reference to direct orthopaedic practitioners to the 100 most influential studies in knee osteotomy and target future research directions. Clinical Relevance: This analysis of the 100 most influential (or cited) scientific publications in osteotomy around the knee will provide a comprehensive inventory of the most impactful academic contributions to a field that has recently regained interest among medical students, residents, fellows and attending physicians. Level of Evidence: N/A.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.