Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40170702›Full record

ArticleJournal of experimental orthopaedics2025

The ability of the Knee Osteoarthritis Outcome Score to detect changes over time is limited in patients with patellar instability due to substantial ceiling effect.

Trine Hysing-Dahl, Anne Gro Heyn Faleide, Per Arne Skarstein Waaler, Eivind Inderhaug

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of experimental orthopaedics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Estimation of the patient acceptable symptom state (PASS) threshold for the Banff Patellofemoral Instability Instrument 2.0.Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Trine Hysing-DahlDepartment of Surgery Haraldsplass Deaconess Hospital Bergen Norway.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3342-681X
Anne Gro Heyn FaleideDepartment of Surgery Haraldsplass Deaconess Hospital Bergen Norway.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3691-1087
Per Arne Skarstein WaalerOrthopedic Clinic Haukeland University Hospital Bergen Norway.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2132-3365
Eivind InderhaugDepartment of Surgery Haraldsplass Deaconess Hospital Bergen Norway.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7959-163X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of the current study was to evaluate important aspects of interpretability (floor and ceiling effects) for the Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) in patients with patellar instability. Secondarily, the study aims to provide minimal important clinical difference (MICD) values for all subscales in this patient category. Methods: Patients undergoing patella stabilising surgery with an individualised approach based on anatomic deviation were prospectively included if (1) ≥13 years of age at the time of surgery, (2) fluent in Norwegian and (3) able to understand and complete the questionnaires. Patients were excluded if they had concomitant bony and/or knee ligament injuries. KOOS was completed before and 6 months after surgery. Results: A substantial ceiling effect was present in the KOOS subscales Conclusion: The substantial ceiling effect in the current implies that the KOOS is not suited to evaluate the long-term effect of treatment in patients with patellar instability. Level of Evidence: Level II.

Indexed as

COSMINNorwich Patellar Instability scorepatellar instabilityreliabilityvalidity

Identifiers

PMID40170702
PMCPMC11959502

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.