ArticleClinical pharmacology and therapeutics2025
Use of Real-World Claims Data to Assess the Prevalence of Concomitant Medications to Inform Drug-Drug Interaction Risk in Target Patient Populations.
Article in Clinical pharmacology and therapeutics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Real-World Claims Data on Prescribed Drugs and the Associated Drug-Drug Interaction Risk in Sickle Cell Disease in the United States.Clinical and translational science · 2026Article
- From Real World Data to Real Impact: A Co-Medication Framework for Lung Cancer to Advance DDI Assessment and Patient-Centric Drug Development.Clinical and translational science · 2026Article
- The unseen architects of metastasis: coagulation factors in pre-metastatic niche development.Cell communication and signaling : CCS · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
A common issue in clinical drug development involves drug-drug interactions (DDI) that may lead to altered drug exposure and subsequent altered safety and efficacy of an investigational drug or concomitant medications (conmeds) in the target patient population. The drug development pipeline therefore involves DDI risk assessment of the investigational drug based on in vitro studies, in silico modeling, and clinical trials. Real-world data (RWD), particularly claims databases with reliable information on pharmacy dispensing, provide an opportunity to understand conmeds usage in the target indication in a real-world setting as one approach to assess potential DDI risk. We describe two cases of characterizing DDI-related conmeds usage with a large closed US-based claims database, IQVIA PharMetrics® Plus, and identified potential DDI risk for multiple sclerosis and hormone receptor-positive breast cancer. For example, prevalent and chronic use of statins (atorvastatin and simvastatin), which are CYP3A4 substrates, were identified among both disease cases. Further examples, limitations, and future directions are also discussed. These insights can therefore help augment decision-making during clinical drug research and development.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.