Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40170514›Full record

ArticleCPT: pharmacometrics & systems pharmacology2025

Mechanistic Physiologically Based Pharmacokinetic Modeling of Dry Powder and Nebulized Formulations of Orally Inhaled TMEM16A Potentiator GDC-6988.

Rui Zhu, Ian Sorrell, Fang Ma, Miaoran Ning, Yoen-Ju Son, Gaohong She, Tom De Bruyn, Joshua Galanter, Nastya Kassir, Ryan Owen and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in CPT: pharmacometrics & systems pharmacology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Rui ZhuGenentech, Inc., South San Francisco, California, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6266-461X
Ian SorrellCertara UK Limited, Sheffield, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9345-9897
Fang MaGenentech, Inc., South San Francisco, California, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0000-8589-0206
Miaoran NingGenentech, Inc., South San Francisco, California, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2949-4759
Yoen-Ju SonGenentech, Inc., South San Francisco, California, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0002-5320-6937
Gaohong SheGenentech, Inc., South San Francisco, California, USA.
Tom De BruynGenentech, Inc., South San Francisco, California, USA.
Joshua GalanterGenentech, Inc., South San Francisco, California, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2561-6384
Nastya KassirGenentech, Inc., South San Francisco, California, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6193-2993
Ryan OwenGenentech, Inc., South San Francisco, California, USA.
Masoud JameiCertara UK Limited, Sheffield, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3443-0194
Iain GardnerCertara UK Limited, Sheffield, UK.
Yuan ChenGenentech, Inc., South San Francisco, California, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5106-0658

Funding

Genentech Inc
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The orally inhaled route of administration for respiratory indications can maximize drug exposure to the site of action (lung) to increase efficacy while minimizing systemic exposure to achieve an improved safety profile. However, due to the difficulty of taking samples from different regions of the human lung, often only systemic pharmacokinetic (PK) samples are taken and assumed to be reflective of the lung PK of the compound, which may not always be the case. In this study, a mechanistic lung physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) model was built using a middle-out approach (i.e., combining elements of bottom-up prediction and using clinical data to inform some model parameters) to predict plasma and lung PK of an orally inhaled TMEM16A potentiator GDC-6988 in humans. The lung PBPK model accounted for lung deposition, lung and oral absorption, systemic clearance, and tissue distribution. The model was refined using data from a Phase 1b study with dry powder (DP) formulation and was also verified using data from a Phase 1 study with a nebulized (Neb) formulation. The refined model adequately captures the observed GDC-6988 plasma PK profiles in both the DP and Neb studies and allows prediction of the regional lung fluid and tissue concentrations. The sensitivity analyses showed that the systemic C

Indexed as

Chloride Channel AgonistsModels, BiologicalAdministration, InhalationAdministration, OralAdultAnoctamin-1Clinical Trials, Phase I as TopicDry Powder InhalersFemaleHumansLungMaleMiddle AgedNebulizers and VaporizersNeoplasm ProteinsPowdersANO1 protein, humanAnoctamin-1Chloride Channel AgonistsNeoplasm ProteinsPowders

Identifiers

PMID40170514
PMCPMC12167913

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.