ArticleCPT: pharmacometrics & systems pharmacology2025
Mechanistic Physiologically Based Pharmacokinetic Modeling of Dry Powder and Nebulized Formulations of Orally Inhaled TMEM16A Potentiator GDC-6988.
Article in CPT: pharmacometrics & systems pharmacology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- A phase 1 evaluation of inhaled oxytocin: Physiologically-based pharmacokinetic model informed dosing of a novel heat-stable oxytocin delivery system.British journal of clinical pharmacology · 2026Trial
- Randomized, phase I studies to evaluate the safety, tolerability, and pharmacokinetics of an inhaled, TMEM16A potentiator, GDC-6988, in healthy subjects.Therapeutic advances in respiratory diseaseTrial
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The orally inhaled route of administration for respiratory indications can maximize drug exposure to the site of action (lung) to increase efficacy while minimizing systemic exposure to achieve an improved safety profile. However, due to the difficulty of taking samples from different regions of the human lung, often only systemic pharmacokinetic (PK) samples are taken and assumed to be reflective of the lung PK of the compound, which may not always be the case. In this study, a mechanistic lung physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) model was built using a middle-out approach (i.e., combining elements of bottom-up prediction and using clinical data to inform some model parameters) to predict plasma and lung PK of an orally inhaled TMEM16A potentiator GDC-6988 in humans. The lung PBPK model accounted for lung deposition, lung and oral absorption, systemic clearance, and tissue distribution. The model was refined using data from a Phase 1b study with dry powder (DP) formulation and was also verified using data from a Phase 1 study with a nebulized (Neb) formulation. The refined model adequately captures the observed GDC-6988 plasma PK profiles in both the DP and Neb studies and allows prediction of the regional lung fluid and tissue concentrations. The sensitivity analyses showed that the systemic C
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.