Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40170421›Full record

ArticleBritish journal of psychology (London, England : 1953)2025

Attraction in every sense: How looks, voice, movement and scent draw us to future lovers and friends.

Annett Schirmer, Marcel Franz, Lea Krismann, Vanessa Nöring, Marlen Große, Mehmet Mahmut, Ilona Croy

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in British journal of psychology (London, England : 1953), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Annett SchirmerInstitute of Psychology, University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria.
Marcel FranzDepartment of Clinical Psychology, University of Jena, Jena, Germany.
Lea KrismannDepartment of Clinical Psychology, University of Jena, Jena, Germany.
Vanessa NöringDepartment of Clinical Psychology, University of Jena, Jena, Germany.
Marlen GroßeDepartment of Clinical Psychology, University of Jena, Jena, Germany.
Mehmet MahmutFood, Flavour and Fragrance Lab, School of Psychological Sciences, Macquarie University, Sydney, Australia.
Ilona CroyDepartment of Clinical Psychology, University of Jena, Jena, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

What makes someone attractive has been examined for faces, in terms of common preferences, and for opposite-sex interactions. We expanded on this by considering also other non-verbal modalities, personal preferences and same-sex interactions. We presented the face, body motion, voice and body odour from 61 non-verbal agents (34 women) as stimuli in an attractiveness rating to 71 perceivers (37 women). Our results showed that the modalities were differently attractive and that some correlated more than others. Specifically, body odours were least and audio-video stimuli most attractive. Voice/looks as well as body odour/movement showed fairly robust positive associations. Both common and personal preferences accounted for variance in the data. Most effects compared between opposite- and same-sex ratings, with only a few exceptions, including that only same-sex ratings showed a clear dominance of personal over common preferences. We conclude that the different non-verbal modalities are equally relevant for attraction but differ in absolute attractiveness and redundancy, likely due to their different suitability for communicating stable (e.g. genetic) versus variable (e.g. hormonal) person characteristics. Beauty excites agreement and disagreement; it matters not only in encounters with the other sex but in social interactions more broadly.

Indexed as

BeautyFriendsSocial PerceptionVoiceAdolescentAdultFemaleHumansMaleOdorantsYoung Adultattractivenessfirst impressionsnon‐verbal communicationsex differences

Identifiers

PMID40170421
PMCPMC12256730

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.