Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40170414›Full record

ArticleMedical physics2025

Imaging system for real-time, full-field pulse-by-pulse surface dosimetry of UHDR electron beams.

Megan Clark, Noah Daniel, Petr Bruza, Rongxiao Zhang, Lesley Jarvis, P Jack Hoopes, David Gladstone

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Medical physics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Megan ClarkThayer School of Engineering, Dartmouth College, Hanover, New Hampshire, USA.
Noah DanielThayer School of Engineering, Dartmouth College, Hanover, New Hampshire, USA.
Petr BruzaThayer School of Engineering, Dartmouth College, Hanover, New Hampshire, USA.
Rongxiao ZhangDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of Missouri, Columbia, Missouri, USA.
Lesley JarvisDepartment of Radiation Oncology Dartmouth, Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, New Hampshire, USA.
P Jack HoopesThayer School of Engineering, Dartmouth College, Hanover, New Hampshire, USA.
David GladstoneThayer School of Engineering, Dartmouth College, Hanover, New Hampshire, USA.

Funding

Translational Engineering in Cancer (TEC)P30CA023108 · NCI · DARTMOUTH COLLEGE · PI Fred W Kolling IV · 1985 to 2026
$91.3M
Optimization of MeV FLASH radiotherapy for normal tissue preservationU01CA260446 · NCI · DARTMOUTH COLLEGE · PI David J. Gladstone, Jack Hoopes · 2022 to 2026
$3.1M
Ultra-fast imaging for the safe delivery of electron FLASH radiation therapyR44CA268466 · NCI · DOSEOPTICS, LLC · PI BRUZA, PETR · 2022 to 2023
$2.0M
Training in Surgical InnovationT32EB021966 · NIBIB · DARTMOUTH COLLEGE · PI Eric R Fossum, Sohail K Mirza · 2017 to 2026
$1.7M
Dartmouth Cancer Center P30CA023108Divison of Cancer Prevention NCI R44CA268466National Science Foundation U01CA260446NCI NIH HHS P30 CA023108NCI NIH HHS R44 CA268466NCI NIH HHS U01 CA260446NIBIB NIH HHS 5T32EB021966NIBIB NIH HHS T32 EB021966
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe interest in ultra-high dose rate (UHDR) radiation therapy (RT) has grown due to its potential to spare normal tissue. However, clinical application is hindered by dosimetry challenges, as current irradiators and dosimeters are not designed for UHDR's high fluence. To ensure safe treatment and accurate dose delivery, real-time dose and dose rate quantification methods are essential. PURPOSE: We propose a novel scintillation imaging system for in vivo, pulse-by-pulse surface dose monitoring during delivery with a UHDR-capable Mobetron (IntraOp LLC Sunnyvale, CA, USA) system. This setup aims to measure entrance beam dose with high 2D spatial and temporal resolution.

methodsA modified collimating cone was 3D printed to house the imaging lens. The system featured a 90° sinuscope endoscope attached to a CMOS camera, was gated by the Mobetron's magnetron output signal, and captured light from a scintillator placed on the treatment surface. Three scintillator types were tested for their emission intensity and decay time. Dose and dose rate linearity studies were performed using various pulse lengths and repetition frequencies, respectively, and the imaging data were compared to an EDGE diode detector (SunNuclear Melbourne, FL, USA) and the Mobetron beam-current transformer (BCT) measurements.

resultsDose (R

conclusionsThe developed imaging system met the criteria for measuring entrance beam dose with high spatial and temporal resolution, offering a promising in vivo dosimetry method for UHDR RT in preclinical and clinical trials.

Indexed as

ElectronsRadiation DosageRadiometryRadiotherapy DosageSurface PropertiesTime Factorse‐FLASHscintillation imaging dosimetryUHDR

Identifiers

PMID40170414
PMCPMC12151750

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.