Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40170393›Full record

ReviewJournal of Alzheimer's disease : JAD2025

Alzheimer's disease blood-based biomarker testing: A stakeholder-informed assessment of coverage considerations.

Patricia A Deverka, Jalayne J Arias, Grace A Lin, Jessica Zwerling, Kathryn A Phillips

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of Alzheimer's disease : JAD, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Patricia A DeverkaDeverka Consulting, LLC, Durham, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-1777-4286
Jalayne J AriasDepartment of Public Health and Behavioral Sciences, School of Public Health, Georgia State University, Atlanta, GA, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-6081-5231
Grace A LinCenter for Translational and Policy Research on Precision Medicine (TRANSPERS), Department of Clinical Pharmacy, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-6498-641X
Jessica ZwerlingDepartment of Neurology, Albert Einstein College of Medicine/Montefiore Medical Center, Bronx, NY, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-3286-3225
Kathryn A PhillipsCenter for Translational and Policy Research on Precision Medicine (TRANSPERS), Department of Clinical Pharmacy, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.

Funding

BUILDING THE EVIDENCE BASE FOR APPROPRIATE AND EFFICIENT IMPLEMENTATION OF EMERGING GENOMIC TESTS FOR DISEASE MANAGEMENT AND SCREENINGR01HG011792 · NHGRI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI PHILLIPS, KATHRYN A · 2021 to 2025
$4.6M
NHGRI NIH HHS R01 HG011792
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BackgroundRecently published clinical studies suggest that blood-based biomarker tests (BBMTs) for Alzheimer's disease (AD) provide value, but in the U.S., neither public nor private payers currently cover these tests.ObjectiveTo describe considerations for payer coverage of AD BBMTs that would need to be addressed to facilitate timely diagnosis and equitable patient access if clinical utility is demonstrated.MethodsWe performed a targeted literature review to characterize predictable coverage barriers for BBMTs and inform the development of an interview guide. We conducted semi-structured interviews with clinicians, researchers, test developers, and a patient advocate and former payer (N = 12) to assess the barriers and refine the proposed key considerations for obtaining payer coverage.ResultsStakeholders noted that payers will require evidence of clinical validity and utility of BBMTs as part of their coverage determinations contingent on the specific indication for testing, with insufficient evidence for screening applications currently. Stakeholders also agreed that there are evidence gaps for use of BBMTs in patients from ethnic and racial minority communities that must be addressed. Given the shortage of memory specialists, stakeholders noted that limiting testing coverage authorization to specialists could be harmful to patients, particularly the underserved. Interviewees also agreed that patients with mild cognitive impairment or early-stage AD could benefit from earlier diagnosis to avoid progressing to moderate disease and limiting eligibility for new disease-modifying therapies.ConclusionsIf BBMTs meet criteria for clinical utility, anticipating and planning for coverage and reimbursement before widespread implementation will be critical to ensuring broad, equitable access to BBMTs.

Indexed as

Alzheimer DiseaseBiomarkersInsurance CoverageHumansStakeholder ParticipationUnited StatesBiomarkersAlzheimer's diseaseclinical utilitydiagnosticshealth equitypayer coverage

Identifiers

PMID40170393
PMCPMC12143641

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.