ArticleEuropean journal of medical research2025
Maternal oxygen inhalation affects the fetal hemodynamic in low-risk with uncomplicated late pregnancy.
Article in European journal of medical research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Alterations in maternal arterial stiffness and maternal and fetal doppler measurements in pregnancy complicated by fetal growth restriction.BMC pregnancy and childbirth · 2025Observational
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundMaternal oxygen inhalation during labor has not been shown to provide significant benefits to newborns. However, its impact on fetal hemodynamics in late pregnancy remains uncertain.
objectiveThis study aimed to investigate the association between maternal oxygen inhalation in the late trimester and changes in fetal hemodynamics. Specifically, we assessed the short-term effects of maternal oxygen administration on fetal Doppler parameters and evaluated whether this practice has potential benefits or risks for the fetus. STUDY
designThese retrospective data were obtained from singleton pregnancies who underwent a after 32 MAIN OUTCOME: The primary outcome presented higher PPI, lower CPR, and lower birth weight for the exposure maternal oxygen inhalation group, compare to non-oxygen inhalation group.
resultsA total of 104 singleton pregnancies were included in the final analysis (oxygen inhalation group: n = 48). No significant differences were observed in the resistance indices of the uterine arteries, umbilical arteries, middle cerebral arteries, descending aorta, ductus venosus, or umbilical vein. However, variations were noted in the oxygen inhalation group. Notably, indices with higher sensitivity for predicting adverse outcomes demonstrated significant differences between groups: PPI was higher in the oxygen inhalation group compared to the non-oxygen inhalation group (0.81 ± 0.12 vs. 0.76 ± 0.11, p < .05), while CPR was also lower in the oxygen inhalation group (1.98 ± 0.56 vs. 2.28 ± 0.70, p < .05). Additionally, birth weight was significantly lower in the oxygen inhalation group compared to the non-oxygen inhalation group (2983.78 ± 468.18 g vs. 3178.41 ± 477.59 g, p < .05).
conclusionOur study found that brief maternal oxygen inhalation in the third trimester was associated with significant changes in fetal hemodynamics, specifically higher PPI and lower CPR. Both of these indices are sensitive markers of unfavorable prenatal outcomes, indicating that maternal oxygen inhalation may adversely affect fetal health. These findings underscore the importance of carefully evaluating the use of oxygen inhalation in pregnant women, especially those in high-risk pregnancies. Additionally, monitoring Doppler indices before and after oxygen administration may help assess fetal well-being and guide clinical decision-making in these situations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.