ArticleThe journal of headache and pain2025
Is migraine a common manifestation of CADASIL-Cons.
Article in The journal of headache and pain, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Efficacy and safety of Chinese botanical drug decoctions for migraine: a Bayesian network meta-analysis.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2026Pooled it
- Novel Mutation ofBalkan journal of medical genetics : BJMG · 2025Article
- Is migraine a common manifestation of CADASIL? Arguments Pros.The journal of headache and pain · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
- Comment on
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
Abstract
Headaches and transient neurological symptoms that bear resemblances to clinical manifestations of migraine, especially migraine with aura, are common among patients with cerebral autosomal dominant arteriopathy with subcortical infarcts and leukoencephalopathy (CADASIL) or cysteine-altering NOTCH3 genetic variants. However, according to the International Classification of Headache Disorders, Third Edition (ICHD-3), these patients should be diagnosed as headache attributed to cerebral autosomal dominant arteriopathy with subcortical infarcts and leukoencephalopathy (CADASIL) rather than migraine with or without aura. Although transient focal neurological symptoms are often labeled as migraine aura, these symptoms are often atypical and complicated, and could not easily conform to the criteria for migraine with aura. Besides, the association between migraine and CADASIL could not be supported by population-based genetic studies, and cysteine-altering NOTCH3 genetic variants are not more common among patients with migraine with or without aura compared with non-migraine controls. In addition, the underlying pathophysiology may be different between migraine and CADASIL. Although increased cortical spreading depression (CSD) susceptibility in mice harboring a human pathogenic Notch3 variant is often regarded as supportive evidence for the association, CSD could been seen in conditions other than migraine, such as cerebral ischemia. The role of calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP), one of the most important molecules in migraine pathophysiology, in CADASIL patients with migraine-like manifestations is yet to be determined. To sum up, there remain uncertainties whether headache and migraine aura-like manifestations in CADASIL correspond to "ordinary" migraine with or without aura seen in routine clinical practice. Therefore, we are still a number of steps from a firm conclusion about the association between CADASIL and migraine.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.