Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40170140›Full record

ArticleBMC nursing2025

Application of a training program system centered on job competency in the standardized training of new nurses.

Fenglian Luo, Jun Cai, Haixia Ma, Xia Wu, Yue Xia

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC nursing, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Fenglian LuoDepartment of Hematology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, No.288, Tian-Wen Road, Chongqing, 40000, China. 300327@hospital.cqmu.edu.cn.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0003-1350-9797
Jun CaiDepartment of Gynecology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China.
Haixia MaDepartment of Hematology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, No.288, Tian-Wen Road, Chongqing, 40000, China.
Xia WuDepartment of Hematology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, No.288, Tian-Wen Road, Chongqing, 40000, China.
Yue XiaDepartment of Hematology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, No.288, Tian-Wen Road, Chongqing, 40000, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThis study investigates the effectiveness of a job competency-centered training system for newly hired nurses during their induction training.

methodsThe control group included 41 nurses who underwent traditional teaching models from 2020 to 2021. The observation group consisted of 39 nurses trained from 2022 to 2024, focusing on job competency. This training covered basic theoretical knowledge, operational skills, professional conduct, communication, emergency response, and comprehensive nursing care skills. Post-training evaluations included competency, theoretical and practical examination scores, Nursing-Mini-CEX excellence rates, patient satisfaction, and humanistic care abilities.

resultsThe observation group achieved higher scores across all assessment areas compared to the control group. Theoretical examination scores were (95.987 ± 2.129) vs. (94.756 ± 2.773), practical scores were (96.987 ± 1.254) vs. (95.902 ± 1.855), and comprehensive scores were (96.487 ± 1.234) vs. (95.329 ± 1.841). Mini-Clinical Evaluation Exercise (Mini-CEX) scores were (8.795 ± 0.409) for the observation group and (8.439 ± 0.594) for the control group. In job competency dimensions, the observation group scored: professional quality (10), general work capability (34.718 ± 0.916), communication and coordination (13.949 ± 0.605), proactive management (13.974 ± 0.778), patient safety (14.128 ± 0.767), health education (8.564 ± 0.552), and overall competency (95.333 ± 1.420). Conversely, the control group scored: professional quality (10), general work capability (34.268 ± 0.708), communication and coordination (13.634 ± 0.733), proactive management (13.634 ± 0.733), patient safety (13.780 ± 0.725), health education (8.293 ± 0.599), and overall competency (93.610 ± 1.481). For humanistic care ability, the observation group had cognitive (66.41 ± 3.362), courage (65.923 ± 3.115), and patience dimensions (60.308 ± 3.686), totaling (192.641 ± 5.451). The control group's scores were cognitive (64.488 ± 3.543), courage (64.317 ± 3.446), and patience (57.902 ± 5.004), totaling (186.707 ± 8.143). Patient satisfaction rates were 100% in the observation group and 95.12% in the control group. Nurses trained under the competency-based model showed significant enhancements in job competency, patient satisfaction, and humanistic care compared to those trained under traditional methods.

conclusionThe job competency-centered induction training model significantly enhances new nurses' job competence, theoretical and practical assessment scores, humanistic care abilities, and patient satisfaction compared to traditional models.

Indexed as

ApplicationJob competencyNew nurseStandardized training

Identifiers

PMID40170140
PMCPMC11963415

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.