ArticleBMC cancer2025
Impact of healthcare-associated infection on healthcare services and survival of patients with cancer: a propensity score-matched retrospective study.
Article in BMC cancer, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- From water to wards: status of integrated preventive strategies to break the chain of infection and antimicrobial resistance in Pakistan.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2026Pooled it
- A sequential mixed-methods study to develop and validate the nursing infection control effectiveness index (NICEI).BMC nursing · 2026Article
- In-depth analysis of risk factors for postoperative pulmonary infection in patients with basal ganglia haemorrhage and construction of prediction model: based on domestic and international cutting-edge clinical research and big data analysis.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Article
- Measuring the burden of nosocomial infection in cancer patients: an analysis based on propensity score matching in China.Frontiers in public health · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundHealthcare-associated infections (HAI) lead to poor patient outcomes, including morbidity, mortality, length of hospital stay (LOS) and costs. However, limited data exists on the impact of HAI on LOS, cost at different quantiles and the survival of patients with cancer.
objectiveTo assess the impact of HAIs on LOS, costs, and survival of cancer patients.
methodsThis retrospective cohort study used data from January 2017 to December 2018 from a tertiary cancer hospital in Henan. Patient demographic data were sourced from the hospital's electronic medical records. Inclusion criteria were primary cancer diagnoses (ICD codes C00-C97). We balanced the distribution of baseline characteristics between patients with HAI and without using propensity score matching. Quantile regression can estimate how independent variables affect dependent variables at different quantiles. We conducted a quantile regression that assessing the impact of HAI on LOS and costs for patients with cancer and using Kaplan-Meier survival curves to compare the survival.
resultsOur study included 291,535 patients with cancer, among of whom 4,784(1.6%) were diagnosed with HAI and 286,748 were not. Patients with HAI exhibited significantly longer hospital stays, with a mean duration of 26.1 days (range: 17.0 to 40.6 days), compared to their counterparts without HAIs, who had an average stay of 7.2 days (range: 4.0 to 14.0 days) (p < 0.01). Economically, the average hospitalization cost for patients without HAI was $1575.8 (range: 865.6 to 3106.3), substantially lower than the $8710.8 (range: $4073.8 to 13434.0) observed for patients with HAI (p < 0.01). After adjusting for confounders in quantile regression models, HAI was associated with a median increase in LOS of 11.4 (95% confidence interval (CI): 10.9-12.0) days and with excess costs of USD 3449.3 (95% CI: 3281.9-3616.7). The hazard ratio (HR) of death for patients with an HAI was significantly higher than for patients without an HAI (HR: 1.62, 95% CI: 1.50-1.74).
conclusionHAI prolongs the LOS, increases hospital costs, and worsens the survival of patients with cancer compared with other diseases. Our quantile regression results indicate that the impact of HAI on hospitalization costs and LOS is more pronounced among patients with higher baseline costs and longer LOS (e.g., at the 95th percentile). This suggests that patients with more severe conditions or advanced disease stages are more vulnerable to the adverse effects of HAI. RELEVANCE TO CLINICAL PRACTICE: Targeted surveillance and preventive interventions, such as early infection screening and strict adherence to infection control protocols, should focus on high-risk patients with prolonged LOS and high costs. By preventing infections in these patients, we can more effectively reduce the additional burden of HAI on costs and LOS. This study informs clinical practice and decision-making for nurses and nursing educators who manage HAI. PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION: Patients and healthcare professionals helped in data collection at the Hospital.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.