Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40170128›Full record

ArticleArthroplasty (London, England)2025

SPECT/CT and triple-phase bone scan: A valuable diagnostic approach for identifying indications for secondary patellar resurfacing in patients with unexplained anterior knee pain post-TKA.

Chuanlong Wu, Hongyi Wang, Zhijie Chen, Jiong Zhang, Zhihong Liu, Jianmin Feng, Xufeng Jiang, Chuan He

Abstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Arthroplasty (London, England), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Chuanlong Wu *Department of Orthopaedics, Shanghai Key Laboratory for Prevention and Treatment of Bone and Joint Diseases, Shanghai Institute of Traumatology and Orthopaedics, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, 200025, China.
Hongyi Wang *Department of Orthopaedics, Shanghai Key Laboratory for Prevention and Treatment of Bone and Joint Diseases, Shanghai Institute of Traumatology and Orthopaedics, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, 200025, China.
Zhijie ChenDepartment of Orthopaedics, Shanghai Key Laboratory for Prevention and Treatment of Bone and Joint Diseases, Shanghai Institute of Traumatology and Orthopaedics, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, 200025, China.
Jiong ZhangDepartment of Orthopaedics, Shanghai Key Laboratory for Prevention and Treatment of Bone and Joint Diseases, Shanghai Institute of Traumatology and Orthopaedics, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, 200025, China.
Zhihong LiuDepartment of Orthopaedics, Shanghai Key Laboratory for Prevention and Treatment of Bone and Joint Diseases, Shanghai Institute of Traumatology and Orthopaedics, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, 200025, China.
Jianmin FengDepartment of Orthopaedics, Shanghai Key Laboratory for Prevention and Treatment of Bone and Joint Diseases, Shanghai Institute of Traumatology and Orthopaedics, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, 200025, China.
Xufeng JiangDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Shanghai Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, 200025, China. jxf10885@rjh.com.cn.
Chuan HeDepartment of Orthopaedics, Shanghai Key Laboratory for Prevention and Treatment of Bone and Joint Diseases, Shanghai Institute of Traumatology and Orthopaedics, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, 200025, China. drhechuan@sina.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6571-3269

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China 81802169Shanghai Guangci Translational Medicine Research and Development Foundation 2022052401Shanghai Municipal Health Commission, Health Industry Clinical Research Special Project 20214Y0003SHWSRS (2023)_62
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThe efficacy of secondary patellar resurfacing (SPR) in alleviating anterior knee pain (AKP) following total knee arthroplasty (TKA) remains uncertain. The purpose of this study was to assess the suitability of SPR using single photon emission computed tomography/computed tomography (SPECT/CT) in conjunction with triple-phase bone scan (TPBS).

methodsWe performed a retrospective analysis on a prospectively-enrolled cohort of patients suffering from AKP in the context of TKA. In this cohort, we identified a subset of 17 patients (involving 18 knees), who had unexplained AKP and were potential candidates for secondary patellar resurfacing (SPR). The candidates for SPR were designated the experimental group, and subjects receiving other forms of treatment were referred to as the Control group. The selection for these treatment options was based on the findings from SPECT/CT and triple-phase bone scan (TPBS). Data collection spanned from preoperative to postoperative follow-up periods and encompassed basic demographics, preoperative findings of SPECT/CT plus TPBS, and Knee Society Score (KSS).

resultsSPECT/CT and TPBS revealed focal radionuclide concentration in the patella in 12 patients (13 knees) and in other locations in 5 patients (5 knees) with unexplained AKP, complementing the findings from medical history and physical examinations. The Experimental group showed signs of patellar maltracking or early-stage patellofemoral osteoarthritis (OA) following TKA and received SPR treatment. Postoperatively, the objective knee indicators score was significantly higher than preoperative scores (88.46 ± 5.77 vs. 76.38 ± 7.64, P < 0.05). Similarly, the functional activities score was significantly improved postoperatively (74.31 ± 6.68 vs. 50.46 ± 9.01, P < 0.05). Patient satisfaction score was substantially elevated after SPR (33.38 ± 2.87 vs. 17.08 ± 5.69, P < 0.05). The control group mainly included patients who experienced loosening, periprosthetic joint infection (PJI), or instability. These patients received revision surgeries tailored to their individual pathologies and postoperative follow-ups showed favorable outcomes.

conclusionsSPECT/CT in combination with TPBS may serve as a valuable tool for assessing the suitability of SPR for the post-TKA management of unexplained AKP. Video Abstract.

Indexed as

Anterior knee painPatellar resurfacingSPECT/CTTotal knee arthroplastyTriple-phase bone scan

Identifiers

PMID40170128
PMCPMC11963298

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.