ArticleJournal of medical case reports2025
Rise and restore: the role of cerebral angiogram with mechanical thrombectomy in the case of cerebral vascular accident and a wake-up stroke: a case report.
Article in Journal of medical case reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundIntravenous thrombolytic therapy with tissue plasminogen activators (that is, tenecteplase, alteplase) and mechanical thrombectomy are both considered standard treatments for acute ischemic stroke, with mechanical thrombectomy being the gold standard for large vessel occlusions. Mechanical thrombectomy is a minimally invasive procedure that is increasingly considered a gold standard for treating ischemic strokes caused by large vessel occlusions, offering a less invasive alternative to traditional surgical options while minimizing vascular and epidermal risks. CASE PRESENTATION: A 45-year-old American male presented with aphasia and right-sided weakness for an unknown time, secondary to a wake-up stroke, was subsequently diagnosed with a cerebral vascular accident and underwent a mechanical thrombectomy. Considering that a large vessel ischemic stroke has a greater risk of poor prognosis, the level of recovery seen in our patient highlights what has been shown in recent trials, namely that expansion of mechanical thrombectomy indications in large-core patients can have a meaningful impact, as up to a third of patients can be functionally independent at 90 days. In our patient's case, he only needed about 96 hours before he was able to go home to his wife and two children. Also, given the large stroke and bearing in mind the risks versus benefits, the decision was made not to be overly aggressive and stent the dissection, as it was not re-occluding and flow-limiting, as this would require dual anti-platelet medications which would have increased the risk of bleeding.
conclusionThis case highlights that effective management requires not only understanding available therapeutic options but also knowing when their application is most appropriate, regardless of the level of invasiveness. This principle is central to optimizing patient outcomes and exemplifies the thoughtful application of clinical judgment-in the words of a colleague: "the art of practicing medicine."
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.