Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40170061›Full record

ArticleJournal of animal science and biotechnology2025

Feeding rumen-protected choline during the periconceptional period programs postnatal phenotype of suckled beef calves.

Masroor Sagheer, McKenzie L J Haimon, Samuel Hincapie Montoya, Daniella Heredia, Federico Tarnonsky, Mauro E Venturini, Angella Gonella-Diaza, Nicolas DiLorenzo, Joseph W McFadden, Gabriela Dalmaso de Melo and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of animal science and biotechnology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Impact of Nutrition on Embryo Production in Cattle: Mechanistic Insights.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Masroor SagheerDepartment of Animal Sciences, D.H. Barron Reproductive and Perinatal Biology Research Program, and Genetics Institute, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA.
McKenzie L J HaimonDepartment of Animal Sciences, D.H. Barron Reproductive and Perinatal Biology Research Program, and Genetics Institute, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA.
Samuel Hincapie MontoyaDepartment of Animal Sciences, D.H. Barron Reproductive and Perinatal Biology Research Program, and Genetics Institute, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA.
Daniella HerediaNorth Florida Research and Education Center, University of Florida, Marianna, FL, USA.
Federico TarnonskyNorth Florida Research and Education Center, University of Florida, Marianna, FL, USA.
Mauro E VenturiniNorth Florida Research and Education Center, University of Florida, Marianna, FL, USA.
Angella Gonella-DiazaNorth Florida Research and Education Center, University of Florida, Marianna, FL, USA.
Nicolas DiLorenzoNorth Florida Research and Education Center, University of Florida, Marianna, FL, USA.
Joseph W McFaddenDepartment of Animal Science, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, USA.
Gabriela Dalmaso de MeloDepartment of Animal Science, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, USA.
Ky G PohlerDepartment of Animal Science, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, USA.
Peter J HansenDepartment of Animal Sciences, D.H. Barron Reproductive and Perinatal Biology Research Program, and Genetics Institute, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA. hansen@animal.ufl.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3061-9333

Funding

National Institute of Food and Agriculture 2020-67015-30821National Institute of Food and Agriculture 2023-67015-40730
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSupplementation of choline chloride in culture medium programs the preimplantation bovine embryo to increase weaning weight of the resultant calf. Here, it was hypothesized that similar programming actions of choline can be induced by feeding rumen-protected choline (RPC) to beef cows during the periconceptional period.

resultsA preliminary experiment was conducted to determine changes in circulating concentrations of choline and its metabolites after RPC supplementation. Suckled beef cows were individually fed 0, 30, 60, and 90 g of RPC (i.e., 0, 8.6, 17.3 and 25.9 g choline chloride) and blood samples were collected at random times after feeding. There were no differences in plasma concentrations of choline or its metabolites between groups. In the second experiment, effects of feeding 60 g/d RPC from d -1 to 7 relative to timed artificial insemination were examined for suckled beef cows. Feeding RPC did not affect pregnancy or calving rates, pregnancy losses, plasma concentrations of pregnancy-associated glycoproteins, gestation length or calf birth weight. Calves from RPC fed dams were lighter than control calves at ~118 days of age (range 75-150; age included in the statistical model) and at weaning at ~248 days of age. There was no effect of treatment on hip height at ~118 days of age although there was a trend for RPC calves to be shorter at weaning. Weight/height ratio was lower for RPC than control at both 118 and 248 days of age. Treatment did not affect testis weight at ~118 days of age.

conclusionsSupplementation of RPC during the periconceptional period programmed development to alter calf phenotype in the postnatal period. The net result, reduced body weight, was the opposite of the phenotype caused by the addition of choline to embryo culture medium.

Indexed as

Beef cattleCholinePregnancyProgramming

Identifiers

PMID40170061
PMCPMC11963524

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.