Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40169995›Full record

ArticleBMC ophthalmology2025

Comparative analysis of deep learning architectures for thyroid eye disease detection using facial photographs.

Amirhossein Aghajani, Mohammad Taher Rajabi, Seyed Mohsen Rafizadeh, Amin Zand, Majid Rezaei, Mohammad Shojaeinia, Elham Rahmanikhah

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in BMC ophthalmology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Amirhossein AghajaniDepartment of Oculo-Facial Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Farabi Eye Hospital, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Qazvin Square, Tehran, Iran.
Mohammad Taher RajabiDepartment of Oculo-Facial Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Farabi Eye Hospital, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Qazvin Square, Tehran, Iran.
Seyed Mohsen RafizadehDepartment of Oculo-Facial Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Farabi Eye Hospital, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Qazvin Square, Tehran, Iran.
Amin ZandDepartment of Oculo-Facial Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Farabi Eye Hospital, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Qazvin Square, Tehran, Iran.
Majid RezaeiDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Mohammad ShojaeiniaDepartment of Health Information Technology and Management, School of Allied Medical Sciences, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Elham RahmanikhahDepartment of Oculo-Facial Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Farabi Eye Hospital, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Qazvin Square, Tehran, Iran. elhamrahmanikhah@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0575-1298

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo compare two artificial intelligence (AI) models, residual neural networks ResNet-50 and ResNet-101, for screening thyroid eye disease (TED) using frontal face photographs, and to test these models under clinical conditions.

methodsA total of 1601 face photographs were obtained. These photographs were preprocessed by cropping to a region centered around the eyes. For the deep learning process, photographs from 643 TED patients and 643 healthy individuals were used for training the ResNet models. Additionally, 81 photographs of TED patients and 74 of normal subjects were used as the validation dataset. Finally, 80 TED cases and 80 healthy subjects comprised the test dataset. For application tests under clinical conditions, data from 25 TED patients and 25 healthy individuals were utilized to evaluate the non-inferiority of the AI models, with general ophthalmologists and fellowships as the control group.

resultsIn the test set verification of the ResNet-50 AI model, the area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve (AUC), accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity were 0.94, 0.88, 0.64, and 0.92, respectively. For the ResNet-101 AI model, these metrics were 0.93, 0.84, 0.76, and 0.92, respectively. In the application tests under clinical conditions, to evaluate the non-inferiority of the ResNet-50 AI model, the AUC, accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity were 0.82, 0.82, 0.88, and 0.76, respectively. For the ResNet-101 AI model, these metrics were 0.91, 0.84, 0.92, and 0.76, respectively, with no statistically significant differences between the two models for any of the metrics (all p-values > 0.05).

conclusionsFace image-based TED screening using ResNet-50 and ResNet-101 AI models shows acceptable accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity for distinguishing TED from healthy subjects.

Indexed as

Deep LearningFaceGraves OphthalmopathyPhotographyAdultFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedNeural Networks, ComputerROC CurveSensitivity and SpecificityArtificial intelligenceFace photographyResidual neural networkThyroid eye disease

Identifiers

PMID40169995
PMCPMC11959711

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.