ArticleInternational journal of obesity (2005)2025
Development and validation of a machine learning model for predicting pediatric metabolic syndrome using anthropometric and bioelectrical impedance parameters.
Article in International journal of obesity (2005), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Application of Artificial Intelligence in the Diagnosis, Prediction, and Management of Metabolic Syndrome: A Systematic Review.Health science reports · 2026Review
- Integrating digital health into pediatric obesity management: Current practices and future perspectives.Obesity pillars · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveMetabolic syndrome (MS) is a risk factor for cardiovascular diseases, and its prevalence is increasing among children and adolescents. This study developed a machine learning model to predict MS using anthropometric and bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA) parameters, highlighting its ability to handle complex, nonlinear variable relationships more effectively than traditional methods such as logistic regression.
methodsThe study included 359 youths from the Korea National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (KNHANES; 16 MS, 343 normal) and 174 youths from real-world clinical data (66 MS, 108 normal). Model 1 used anthropometric data, Model 2 used BIA parameters, and Model 3 combined both. The eXtreme Gradient Boosting trained the models, and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) evaluated performance. Shapley value analysis was applied to assess the contribution of each parameter to the model's prediction.
resultsThe AUCs for Models 1, 2, and 3 were 0.75, 0.66, and 0.90, respectively, in the KNHANES dataset, and 0.56, 0.61, and 0.74, respectively, in the real-world dataset. In pairwise comparison, Model 3 outperformed both Model 1 and Model 2 in both the KNHANES dataset (Model 1 vs. Model 3, p = 0.026; Model 2 vs. Model 3, p = 0.033) and the real-world dataset (Model 1 vs. Model 3, p = 0.035; Model 2 vs. Model 3, p = 0.008). Body fat mass was identified as the most significant contributor to Model 3.
conclusionThe integrated model using both anthropometric and BIA parameters demonstrated strong predictability for pediatric MS, underlining its potential as an effective screening tool for MS in both clinical and general populations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40169924What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.