ArticleScientific reports2025
Building occupancy estimation using single channel CW radar and deep learning.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Building sensor coverage in couture: balancing cost, coverage, and comfort.Scientific reports · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Counting the number of people in a room is crucial for optimizing smart buildings, enhancing energy efficiency, and ensuring security while preserving privacy. This study introduces a novel radar-based occupancy estimation method leveraging a 24-GHz Continuous Wave (CW) radar system integrated with time-frequency mapping techniques using Continuous Wavelet Transform (CWT) and power spectrum analysis. Unlike previous studies that rely on WiFi or PIR-based sensors, this approach provides a robust alternative without privacy concerns. The time-frequency scalograms generated from radar echoes were used to train deep-learning models, including DarkNet19, MobileNetV2, and ResNet18. Experiments conducted with sedentary occupants over 4 hours and 40 minutes resulted in 1680 image samples. The proposed approach achieved high accuracy, with DarkNet19 performing the best, reaching 92.7% on CWT images and 92.3% on power spectrum images. Additionally, experiments in a walking environment with another continuous 1 hour of data achieved 86.5% accuracy, demonstrating the method's effectiveness beyond static scenarios. These results confirm that CW radar with deep learning can enable non-intrusive, privacy-preserving occupancy estimation for smart building applications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.