Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40169885›Full record

Observational studyEye (London, England)2025

Early intraocular pressure dynamics following aflibercept 8 mg versus aflibercept 2 mg: a propensity score-matched analysis.

Valentina Sarao, Daniele Veritti, Francesco Bonini, Asia Amelia Martin, Paolo Lanzetta

Abstract readObservational StudyComparative Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Eye (London, England), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Eighteen-month real-world outcomes of intravitreal aflibercept 8 mg in treatment-naïve neovascular age-related macular degeneration: a UK single-centre experience.Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie · 2026
    Article
  2. Aflibercept 8 mg for diabetic macular edema and neovascular age-related macular degeneration: an italian expert consensus paper.Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Valentina SaraoDepartment of Medicine-Ophthalmology, University of Udine, Udine, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0041-5073
Daniele VerittiDepartment of Medicine-Ophthalmology, University of Udine, Udine, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0148-5348
Francesco BoniniDepartment of Medicine-Ophthalmology, University of Udine, Udine, Italy.
Asia Amelia MartinDepartment of Medicine-Ophthalmology, University of Udine, Udine, Italy.
Paolo LanzettaDepartment of Medicine-Ophthalmology, University of Udine, Udine, Italy. paolo.lanzetta@uniud.it.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3746-141X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo compare early intraocular pressure (IOP) dynamics following intravitreal injections of aflibercept 8 mg versus aflibercept 2 mg using propensity score-matched analysis with fellow eye controls.

methodsThis prospective observational study included treatment-naïve patients with neovascular age-related macular degeneration (AMD) or diabetic macular oedema (DMO). Patients received aflibercept 8 mg or 2 mg based on investigator discretion. IOP was measured using iCare rebound tonometry at baseline (T0), 1 min (T1), 10 min (T2), 30 min (T3), and 3 months (T4) after the initial treatment. Untreated fellow eyes served as controls. Secondary analyses evaluated predictors of significant IOP elevation.

resultsA total of 1820 IOP measurements from 140 eyes (35 treated with aflibercept 8 mg and 35 with aflibercept 2 mg and their respective untreated fellow eyes) were analysed. Both formulations induced significant immediate IOP elevations at T1 (55.6 ± 15.2 mmHg for 8 mg, 54.2 ± 20.4 mmHg for 2 mg) compared to baseline values (p < 0.001). Pressures decreased progressively, approaching baseline by T3 (19.3 ± 5.9 mmHg for 8 mg, 20.5 ± 6.6 mmHg for 2 mg), with no significant differences between doses (p > 0.05). Pre-existing glaucoma emerged as the strongest predictor of sustained IOP elevation, while DMO eyes exhibited higher initial spikes compared to neovascular AMD. Three-month IOP remained stable across both groups.

conclusionsIntravitreal administration of aflibercept 8 mg demonstrates IOP dynamics comparable to the 2 mg formulation, with rapid normalization of pressure spikes by 30 min. These findings suggest enhanced monitoring may be beneficial for patients with glaucoma or DMO.

Indexed as

Angiogenesis InhibitorsIntraocular PressureMacular EdemaReceptors, Vascular Endothelial Growth FactorRecombinant Fusion ProteinsWet Macular DegenerationAgedAged, 80 and overDiabetic RetinopathyFemaleHumansIntravitreal InjectionsMaleMiddle AgedPropensity ScoreProspective StudiesafliberceptAngiogenesis InhibitorsReceptors, Vascular Endothelial Growth FactorRecombinant Fusion ProteinsVascular Endothelial Growth Factor A

Identifiers

PMID40169885
PMCPMC12209406

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.