ArticleScientific reports2025
Factors associated with increased severity of generalized myasthenia gravis among patients in the United States and Europe.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- A Delphi consensus on integrating novel therapies into the management of generalized myasthenia gravis.Therapeutic advances in neurological disorders · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Among individuals with generalized myasthenia gravis (gMG), risk factors for increased severity over time are unknown. This study examined the association between demographic and clinical variables and patient progression to a more severe MG Foundation of America (MGFA) classification. Data were drawn from the Adelphi Real World myasthenia gravis Disease Specific Programme™, a cross-sectional survey capturing retrospective data from patients' medical histories. Among 421 individuals, 16% experienced increased gMG severity (progression to higher MGFA class between diagnosis and the time of the survey, 1-7 years later) and for 84%, gMG was stable/improved (MGFA class the same/lower). Logistic elastic net regression determined that increased severity was associated with the occurrence of prior misdiagnosis. Bivariate analyses indicated significant associations between increased severity and longer time between symptom onset and (a) the first consultation with a healthcare practitioner and (b) MG diagnosis. Increased severity was also associated with older age and presence of specific symptoms at diagnosis. gMG stability/improvement was associated with employment status and general fatigue at diagnosis. There is a need for prompt and accurate diagnosis and improved treatment options with the potential to increase the likelihood of stability/improvement for gMG patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.