ArticleEuropean journal of human genetics : EJHG2025
Reassessment of FBN1 variants of uncertain significance using updated ClinGen guidance for PP1/BS4 and PP4 criteria.
Article in European journal of human genetics : EJHG, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Charting the Phenotypic Landscape of FBN1 Variants in Marfan Syndrome With Ectopia Lentis Through Extreme Phenotype Sampling.Investigative ophthalmology & visual science · 2026Article
- Comprehensive evaluation of ACMG/AMP-based variant classification tools.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2026Article
- Editorial Déjà Vu: This time, it's actually 'what's new in EJHG in May 2025?'European journal of human genetics : EJHG · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Marfan syndrome (MFS) is a genetic disorder caused by an FBN1 variant and is diagnosed based on the revised Ghent criteria, which incorporate clinical manifestations and genetic testing. Up-to-date FBN1 variant interpretation is crucial for proper diagnosis and management of MFS; however, some FBN1 variants of uncertain significance (VUSs) remain inconclusive despite applying Clinical Genome Resource (ClinGen) FBN1-specific guideline. Recently, the ClinGen guidance for PP1/BS4 co-segregation and PP4 phenotype specificity criteria (new PP1/PP4 criteria) were released. Here, we performed reassessment of FBN1 VUSs using these new PP1/PP4 criteria. FBN1 VUSs collected from December 2015 to April 2024 were reassessed according to the ClinGen FBN1-specific guideline and new PP1/PP4 criteria. Medical records and previous studies were reviewed to evaluate the phenotype-specificity of evidence based on the revised Ghent criteria. Collectively, 927 patients with suspected MFS underwent FBN1 sequencing and 72 VUSs were detected. When applying the FBN1-specific guideline only, of 72 VUSs, 29 (40.3%) were reclassified as pathogenic variants (PVs) or likely PVs (LPVs). When additionally applying the new PP1/PP4 criteria, 16 (37.2%) of the remaining 43 VUSs were reclassified as LPVs. After reassessing FBN1 VUSs according to the new PP1/PP4 criteria, the rate of reclassification from VUS to PV/LPV significantly increased from 40.3% to 62.5%. The new PP1/PP4 criteria provide sufficient evidence for evaluating the pathogenicity of FBN1 variants detected in MFS patients fulfilling the revised Ghent criteria and will be helpful in clinical analysis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.