ArticleScientific reports2025
Evaluation of comprehensive benefits and the degree of coupling coordination for soil health products: a case study in Weifang City, China.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Evaluating the economic, social, and environmental benefits and coupling coordination of soil health products (SHPs) is required for rational soil science management and sustainable agricultural development. Therefore, this paper developed a comprehensive evaluation index system for Weifang City, Shandong Province, China, with the natural breakpoint method and a coupling coordination model to estimate the comprehensive benefits and coupling coordination of SHPs from 2018 to 2021. The comprehensive benefit scores exhibited a generally upward trend over time and regional spatial heterogeneity. However, the economic benefit scores were higher and more closely related to the planting goals of farmers, while the social benefit scores exhibited less fluctuation and lower regional heterogeneity, and the environmental benefit scores were low. In terms of the degree of coupling coordination, the economic, social, and environmental benefits of SHPs were found to be barely coordinated and on the verge of disorder, with distinct spatial distribution characteristics. The disorder of each system was affected by multiple compound factors and significant uncertainty. The results of the present study thus provide a theoretical foundation for decision-making by government and agricultural organizations regarding the use of SHPs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.