Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40169765›Full record

ArticleBritish journal of cancer2025

Individualized dynamic risk assessment and treatment selection for multiple myeloma.

Carl Murie, Serdar Turkarslan, Anoop P Patel, David G Coffey, Pamela S Becker, Nitin S Baliga

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in British journal of cancer, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Carl MurieInstitute for Systems Biology, Seattle, WA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0007-2565-0615
Serdar TurkarslanInstitute for Systems Biology, Seattle, WA, USA.
Anoop P PatelDepartment of Neurosurgery, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7078-9535
David G CoffeyDivision of Myeloma, University of Miami, Miami, FL, USA.
Pamela S BeckerDepartments of Hematology and Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation and Hematologic Malignancies Translational Science, City of Hope National Medical Center, Duarte, CA, USA.
Nitin S BaligaInstitute for Systems Biology, Seattle, WA, USA. nitin.baliga@isbscience.org.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9157-5974

Funding

Translational Bioimaging Core Shared ResourceP30CA015704 · NCI · FRED HUTCHINSON CANCER RESEARCH CENTER · PI Eric Collisson · 1985 to 2026
$296.4M
Site Specific Immunophenotyping Assays of COVID19 Patients to Align with NIAID National StudyR01AI141953 · NIAID · INSTITUTE FOR SYSTEMS BIOLOGY · PI BALIGA, NITIN S · 2019 to 2023
$5.7M
Systems biology of intratumoral heterogeneity in glioblastomaR01CA259469 · NCI · INSTITUTE FOR SYSTEMS BIOLOGY · PI Nitin S Baliga, CHARLES S COBBS · 2022 to 2026
$3.7M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA015704NCI NIH HHS R01 CA259469NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI141953U.S. Department of Health & Human Services | National Institutes of Health (NIH) NCI-5R01AI141953-04U.S. Department of Health & Human Services | National Institutes of Health (NIH) NCI-5R01CA259469-02U.S. Department of Health & Human Services | National Institutes of Health (NIH) NSF1565166U.S. Department of Health & Human Services | National Institutes of Health (NIH) NSF2042948
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIndividualized treatment decisions for multiple myeloma (MM) patients require accurate risk stratification that accounts for patient-specific consequences of cytogenetic abnormalities on disease progression.

methodsPreviously, SYstems Genetic Network AnaLysis (SYGNAL) of multi-omics tumor profiles from 881 MM patients generated a mmSYGNAL network of transcriptional programs underlying disease progression across MM subtypes. Here, through machine learning on activity profiles of mmSYGNAL programs we have generated a unified framework of cytogenetic subtype-specific models for individualized risk classifications and prediction of treatment response.

resultsTesting on 1,367 patients across five independent cohorts demonstrated that the framework of mmSYGNAL risk models significantly outperformed cytogenetics, International Staging System, and multi-gene biomarker panels in predicting PFS at primary diagnosis, pre- and post-transplant and even after multiple relapses, making it useful for individualized risk assessment throughout the disease trajectory. Further, treatment response predictions were significantly concordant with efficacy of 67 drugs in killing myeloma cells from eight relapsed refractory patients. The model also provided new insights into matching MM patients to drugs used in standard of care, at relapse, and in clinical trials.

conclusionActivities of transcriptional programs offer significantly better prognostic and predictive assessments of treatments across different stages of MM in an individual patient.

Indexed as

Multiple MyelomaPrecision MedicineBiomarkers, TumorFemaleHumansMachine LearningMaleMiddle AgedPrognosisRisk AssessmentBiomarkers, Tumor

Identifiers

PMID40169765
PMCPMC12081869

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.