ArticleBritish journal of cancer2025
Individualized dynamic risk assessment and treatment selection for multiple myeloma.
Article in British journal of cancer, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Artificial intelligence reshaping the paradigm of hematologic malignancy diagnosis and treatment: From static assessment to dynamic precision management.Annals of hematology · 2026Review
- From static risk to dynamic disease monitoring: the role of MRD and immune profiling in multiple myeloma.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
- Shaping the future of multiple myeloma with artificial intelligence and digital twins: from concept to clinic.Frontiers in digital health · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
- Update of
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundIndividualized treatment decisions for multiple myeloma (MM) patients require accurate risk stratification that accounts for patient-specific consequences of cytogenetic abnormalities on disease progression.
methodsPreviously, SYstems Genetic Network AnaLysis (SYGNAL) of multi-omics tumor profiles from 881 MM patients generated a mmSYGNAL network of transcriptional programs underlying disease progression across MM subtypes. Here, through machine learning on activity profiles of mmSYGNAL programs we have generated a unified framework of cytogenetic subtype-specific models for individualized risk classifications and prediction of treatment response.
resultsTesting on 1,367 patients across five independent cohorts demonstrated that the framework of mmSYGNAL risk models significantly outperformed cytogenetics, International Staging System, and multi-gene biomarker panels in predicting PFS at primary diagnosis, pre- and post-transplant and even after multiple relapses, making it useful for individualized risk assessment throughout the disease trajectory. Further, treatment response predictions were significantly concordant with efficacy of 67 drugs in killing myeloma cells from eight relapsed refractory patients. The model also provided new insights into matching MM patients to drugs used in standard of care, at relapse, and in clinical trials.
conclusionActivities of transcriptional programs offer significantly better prognostic and predictive assessments of treatments across different stages of MM in an individual patient.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.