ReviewNature protocols2025
Quantitative molecular imaging using deep magnetic resonance fingerprinting.
Review in Nature protocols, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- An Open-Source, Reproducible MRI Data Acquisition and Reconstruction Workflow Using Pulseq: Multi-Site and Cross-Vendor Validation.Magnetic resonance in medicine · 2026Article
- Self-Derived Dynamic Field Map Estimation and Correction in CEST MRI.Magnetic resonance in medicine · 2026Article
- MR-based techniques for imaging prostate cancer metabolism: current status and future perspectives.Abdominal radiology (New York) · 2026Review
- An Interpretable Deep-Learning Approach for Efficient CEST Parameter Quantification: Importance-Ranked Saturation Transfer MRI Protocol.Magnetic resonance in medicine · 2026Article
- Article
- Optimization of Pulsed Saturation Transfer MR Fingerprinting (ST MRF) Acquisition Using the Cramér-Rao Bound and Sequential Quadratic Programming.Magnetic resonance in medicine · 2026Article
- Quantitative multi-metabolite imaging of Parkinson's disease using AI boosted molecular MRI.Npj imaging · 2025Article
- Multi-contrast generation and quantitative MRI using a transformer-based framework with RF excitation embeddings.Communications biology · 2025Article
- Harnessing Dynamic Supramolecular Interactions for Lanthanide Detection via Computational Pattern Recognition of Magnetic Resonance Fingerprints.Journal of the American Chemical Society · 2025Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Deep learning-based saturation transfer magnetic resonance fingerprinting (MRF) is an emerging approach for noninvasive in vivo imaging of proteins, metabolites and pH. It involves a series of steps, including sample/participant preparation, image acquisition schedule design, biophysical model formulation and artificial intelligence and computational model training, followed by image acquisition, deep reconstruction and analysis. Saturation transfer-based molecular MRI has been slow to reach clinical maturity and adoption for clinical practice due to its technical complexity, semi-quantitative contrast-weighted nature and long scan times needed for the extraction of quantitative molecular biomarkers. Deep MRF provides solutions to these challenges by providing a quantitative and rapid framework for extracting biologically and clinically meaningful molecular information. Here we define a complete protocol for quantitative molecular MRI using deep MRF. We describe in vitro sample preparation and animal and human scan considerations, and provide intuition behind the acquisition protocol design and optimization of chemical exchange saturation transfer (CEST) and semi-solid magnetization transfer (MT) quantitative imaging. We then extensively describe the building blocks for several artificial intelligence models and demonstrate their performance for different applications, including cancer monitoring, brain myelin imaging and pH quantification. Finally, we provide guidelines to further modify and expand the pipeline for imaging a variety of other pathologies (such as neurodegeneration, stroke and cardiac disease), accompanied by the related open-source code and sample data. The procedure takes between 48 min (for two proton pools or in vitro imaging) and 57 h (for complex multi-proton pool in vivo imaging) to complete and is suitable for graduate student-level users.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.