ArticleScientific reports2025
Tracking WNV transmission with a combined dog and wild boar surveillance system.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Wild boar as a sentinel species for ecosystem health surveillance: A review.One health (Amsterdam, Netherlands) · 2026Review
- First Detection of Usutu Virus in Harbor Seals (Viruses · 2026Article
- Integrated Surveillance of Viral Pathogens in Wild Boars: Serological and Molecular Insight in Southern Italy.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2026Article
- Multiplex serological screening of wild boar as sentinels of emerging zoonoses: HEV, WNV, and TBEV distribution in Saxony, Germany.One health (Amsterdam, Netherlands) · 2025Article
- West Nile virus unmasked: from gene variability to future challenges.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
West Nile virus (WNV) is a mosquito-borne flavivirus mainly circulating in eastern Germany, causing annually reoccurring epizootics in the avifauna as well as sporadic infections in humans and horses. WNV is closely-related to Usutu virus (USUV) and tick-borne encephalitis virus (TBEV) and co-infections thereof are becoming more frequent. To not solely be dependent on the monitoring of wild birds and horses the availability of alternative sentinel species is advantageous. The study examined the seroprevalence of WNV antibodies (Abs) in eastern Germany in readily available species: dogs, wild boars, sheep, and goats. An NS1-ELISA was implemented to ease future differentiation of cross-reacting flavivirus Abs with a sensitivity of 92.3 and 90.9% for dog and wild boar sera, respectively. Flavivirus seroprevalences were the highest in wild boars with 42.03%, followed by dogs with 7.86%, and small ruminants with 1.57%. In the wild boars and dogs, WNV Abs were most frequent (17.64 and 3.90%, respectively) while seroprevalences in small ruminants and of USUV were lower. The NS1-ELISA is cost-efficient and reliable in monitoring WNV Abs in dogs as well as wild boars and the combined testing thereof could be ideal in detecting semi-urban transmission events prior to wildlife-human spill overs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.