ArticleScientific reports2025
Histopathological analysis of duragen collagen matrix over time in humans.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Septal flip flap after endoscopic unilateral resection of sinonasal tumors: a multicenter experience of 133 patients.European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery · 2026Article
- Intraoperative Agents for Hemostasis and Dural Reconstruction in Neurosurgery.Neurosurgery practice · 2026Review
- Translational Evaluation of an Intraparenchymal Collagen Matrix Tamponade: Initial Preclinical and Clinical Experiments to Prevent CSF Reflux Following Endoscopic Brain Surgery.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
DuraGen is a widely used type I collagen matrix derived from bovine Achilles tendon that promotes fibroblast ingrowth and neovascularization. However, it remains unknown the time required for dura regeneration and reabsorption of the graft. We evaluate the histopathological characteristics of implanted DuraGen in humans across multiple time points. Patients who underwent a decompressive craniectomy and duraplasty with DuraGen at our institution between January 2020 and September 2021 were prospectively enrolled. At the time of the subsequent surgery, including cranioplasty, DuraGen and associated tissues removed from patients were sent for histopathological analysis. For each patient, time from index surgery to subsequent surgery was categorized into three groups: early (0-20 days), intermediate (21-30 days), and late (> 30 days). Baseline characteristics, primary disease, operative time, complication rate, and histopathological findings were compared between groups. A total of 28 patients were enrolled in the study. Seven specimens (25.0%) were collected within 20 days after craniectomy, 9 specimens (35.7%) between 21 and 30 days, and 12 specimens (39.3%) over 31 days. Histopathologically, implanted collagen matrix, erythrocyte infiltration, and fibrin layer decreased over time, whereas fibroblasts and endogenous collagen increased. Receiver operating characteristic analysis showed that the cut-off time post-implantation for presence of endogenous collagen was 34 days after DuraGen implantation (area under the curve = 0.810). We found that DuraGen was replaced by fibroblast-derived endogenous collagen as early as 34 days post-implantation. Although certain findings remain to be further validated, the present study substantiates DuraGen as a reliable substitute, with findings derived from clinical outcomes and histopathological changes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.