Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40169698›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Machine learning-driven insights into self-healing silicon-based anodes for high-performance lithium-ion batteries.

Mahta Moazzenzadeh, Mahmoud Samadpour

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Mahta MoazzenzadehDepartment of Physics, K. N. Toosi University of Technology, Tehran, Iran.
Mahmoud SamadpourDepartment of Physics, K. N. Toosi University of Technology, Tehran, Iran. samadpour@kntu.ac.ir.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In recent years, the utilization of silicon, rather than graphite, has emerged as a compelling alternative for anode materials in Li-ion batteries, promising higher energy density. However, a significant challenge lies in the degradation of silicon anodes due to volume fluctuations during charge and discharge cycles, resulting in a rapid decline in battery capacity. To tackle this issue, researchers are investigating the integration of self-healing polymers as binding agents in the anode structure through trial-and-error approaches, which is both time-consuming and expensive. Overcoming practical experimentation challenges, this study delves self-healing polymers through machine learning methods as a more practical approach. The role of structural features and functional groups within these polymers in maintaining anode integrity and prolonging battery capacity across multiple charge cycles were explored by utilization of random forest, ridge algorithms, support vector machines, and neural networks. Notably, the neural networks algorithm exhibits superior performance, achieving 96% accuracy for test data. SHAP analysis revealed that ether functional groups, donor and acceptor hydrogen bonds, and dual-interconnected rings have the most positive impact on preserving battery capacity. In this study, we introduce a set of design principles for selecting functional groups aimed at enhancing the self-healing capabilities and prolonging the lifespan of Si-based LIBs. This study has the potential to pave the way for the development of more efficient and enduring Li-ion batteries.

Indexed as

Li-ion batteryMachine learningNeural networkSelf-Healing polymerSilicon anode

Identifiers

PMID40169698
PMCPMC11961629

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.