ArticleScientific reports2025
Developing advanced datadriven framework to predict the bearing capacity of piles on rock.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Identification of suitable methods for static pile load capacity and recommendation for BNBC 2020.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Pareto-optimized stacked ensemble machine learning framework for predicting bearing capacity of driven piles from static load test data.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Developing machine learning frameworks to predict mechanical properties of ultra-high performance concrete mixed with various industrial byproducts.Scientific reports · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Developing accurate predictive models for pile bearing capacity on rock is crucial for optimizing foundation design and ensuring structural stability. This research presents an advanced data-driven framework that integrates multiple machine learning algorithms to predict the bearing capacity of piles based on geotechnical and in-situ test parameters. A comprehensive dataset comprising key influencing factors such as pile dimensions, geological characteristics, and penetration resistance was utilized to train and validate various models, including Kstar, M5Rules, ElasticNet, XNV, and Decision Trees. The Taylor diagram and statistical evaluations demonstrated the superiority of the proposed models in capturing complex nonlinear relationships, with high correlation coefficients and low root mean square errors indicating robust predictive capabilities. Sensitivity analyses using Hoffman and Gardener's approach and SHAP values identified the most influential parameters, revealing that penetration resistance, pile embedment depth, and geological conditions significantly impact pile capacity. The findings underscore the effectiveness of machine learning in geotechnical engineering applications, offering a reliable and efficient alternative to traditional empirical and analytical methods. The developed framework provides engineers and practitioners with a powerful tool for improving pile design accuracy, reducing uncertainties, and optimizing construction practices. Future research should focus on expanding the dataset with diverse geological conditions and exploring hybrid modeling techniques to enhance prediction accuracy further.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.