Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40169672›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Advanced design of 3D knitted padding for wearable cushioning in knee protector.

Annie Yu, Yijia Zhang, Shunji Takeuchi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Annie YuST709, School of Fashion and Textiles, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hung Hom, Kowloon, Hong Kong. annieyu@polyu.edu.hk.
Yijia ZhangFaculty of Fiber Science and Engineering, Kyoto Institute of Technology, Matsugasaki, Sakyo-ku, Kyoto, 606-8585, Japan.
Shunji TakeuchiFaculty of Textile Science and Technology, Shinshu University, 3 Chome-15-1 Tokida, Ueda, Nagano, 386-8567, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Wearable cushioned products protect the body during sporting activities or work-related activities. Cushioning paddings made of elastomeric materials are used to absorb impact forces. The paddings are usually inelastic, which could be challenging to accommodate the movement of knee joints and lead to displacement. In this study, a new knitted composite which consists of soft surface layers, a shock absorption middle layer made of monofilament and silicone inlays and additional elastic inlays in the surface layer to accommodate the body contours is developed. The three-layer structure is knitted as 3D knee paddings in a single process. The air permeability, mechanical properties, and subjective wear comfort of the knitted paddings and their impact on muscle activity are evaluated and compared with those of commercially available elastomeric knee paddings. The results show that the knitted padding with a silicone inlay can better absorb impact forces than that without the inlay showing a 14% increment. The 3D knitted padding is perceived to be more soft, elastic and bendable, with a better fit and wear comfort, with more slip resistance than the elastomeric padding with a similar thickness. The outcomes can act as a good reference for the development of textile cushioning materials.

Indexed as

Knee JointProtective ClothingWearable Electronic DevicesEquipment DesignHumansMale3D knitted structureComfort perceptionImpact force absorptionsEMGSilicone inlaid

Identifiers

PMID40169672
PMCPMC11961583

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.