Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40169660›Full record

ArticleScientific data2025

Genome-centric metagenomics reveals uncharacterised microbiomes in Angus cattle.

Thibault P R A Legrand, Pâmela A Alexandre, Annaleise Wilson, Ryan J Farr, Antonio Reverter, Stuart E Denman

Abstract readDataset
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific data, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Thibault P R A LegrandCSIRO Agriculture & Food, St Lucia, Queensland, Australia. thibault.legrand@csiro.au.
Pâmela A AlexandreCSIRO Agriculture & Food, St Lucia, Queensland, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0649-7033
Annaleise WilsonCSIRO Health & Biosecurity, Geelong, Victoria, Australia.
Ryan J FarrCSIRO Health & Biosecurity, Geelong, Victoria, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1636-1815
Antonio ReverterCSIRO Agriculture & Food, St Lucia, Queensland, Australia.
Stuart E DenmanCSIRO Agriculture & Food, St Lucia, Queensland, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Understanding the intricate nexus between cattle health and microbiome dynamics holds profound implications for enhancing animal productivity and welfare. However, our understanding of the role of these microbial communities is limited in beef cattle, especially in understudied body sites such as the oral and nasal microbiome. Here, using a genome-centric metagenomics approach, we recovered substantial metagenome-assembled genomes (MAGs) from the faecal, oral and nasal microbiome of Australian Angus cattle from different herds and life stages. The MAGs recovered from faecal samples were dominated by Bacillota and Bacteroidota, while the MAGs from saliva and nasal mucus samples were mainly associated with Pseudomonadota, Actinomycetota and Bacteroidota. Functional annotation of the MAGs revealed enriched pathways involved in the production of some amino acids, nucleic acids and short chain fatty acids (SCFA). The metabolic capacities of the MAGs were correlated with their taxonomy, notably at the phylum level. Overall, this study provides a comprehensive catalogue of MAGs to further our understanding of their role in the health and fitness of beef cattle.

Indexed as

CattleMetagenomeMicrobiotaAnimalsFecesMetagenomics

Identifiers

PMID40169660
PMCPMC11961633

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.