ArticleScientific data2025
Genome-centric metagenomics reveals uncharacterised microbiomes in Angus cattle.
Article in Scientific data, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- RuSpacer: a CRISPR spacer database derived from ruminant-associated prokaryotes for virome analysis.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- HLRMDB: a comprehensive database of the human microbiome with metagenomic assembly, taxonomic classification, and functional annotation by analysis of long-read and hybrid sequencing data.Nucleic acids research · 2026Article
- Next-generation detection in bovine respiratory and enteric diseases: metagenomic and amplicon sequencing insights into microbial diversity.Frontiers in veterinary science · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Understanding the intricate nexus between cattle health and microbiome dynamics holds profound implications for enhancing animal productivity and welfare. However, our understanding of the role of these microbial communities is limited in beef cattle, especially in understudied body sites such as the oral and nasal microbiome. Here, using a genome-centric metagenomics approach, we recovered substantial metagenome-assembled genomes (MAGs) from the faecal, oral and nasal microbiome of Australian Angus cattle from different herds and life stages. The MAGs recovered from faecal samples were dominated by Bacillota and Bacteroidota, while the MAGs from saliva and nasal mucus samples were mainly associated with Pseudomonadota, Actinomycetota and Bacteroidota. Functional annotation of the MAGs revealed enriched pathways involved in the production of some amino acids, nucleic acids and short chain fatty acids (SCFA). The metabolic capacities of the MAGs were correlated with their taxonomy, notably at the phylum level. Overall, this study provides a comprehensive catalogue of MAGs to further our understanding of their role in the health and fitness of beef cattle.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.